Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37853106›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2024

Associations of presenting visual acuity with morphological changes on OCT in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: PRECISE Study Report 2.

Shruti Chandra, Sarega Gurudas, Benjamin J L Burton, Geeta Menon, Ian Pearce, Martin Mckibbin, Ajay Kotagiri, James Talks, Anna Grabowska, Faruque Ghanchi and 10 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 13 institutions in 2 countries.

Shruti ChandraNational Institute of Health Research Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2634-9775
Sarega GurudasInstitute of Ophthalmology, University College, London, UK.
Benjamin J L BurtonJames Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norfolk, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9579-9078
Geeta MenonFrimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey, UK.
Ian PearceThe Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Martin MckibbinLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4388-243X
Ajay KotagiriSouth Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, UK.
James TalksNewcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK.
Anna GrabowskaKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3053-2142
Faruque GhanchiBradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4448-8162
Richard GaleHull York Medical School and York, University of York and Scarborough Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK.
Andrea GianiBoehringer Ingelheim, Binger Str. 173, 55216, Ingelheim am, Rhein, Germany.
Victor ChongInstitute of Ophthalmology, University College, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7693-522X
Taffeta Ching Ning YamaguchiBoehringer Ingelheim, Binger Str. 173, 55216, Ingelheim am, Rhein, Germany.
Bishwanath PalNational Institute of Health Research Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.
Sridevi ThottarathNational Institute of Health Research Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.
Raheeba Muhamed PakeerNational Institute of Health Research Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.
Swati ChandakNational Institute of Health Research Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.
Andrea MonteselNational Institute of Health Research Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.
Sobha SivaprasadNational Institute of Health Research Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK. sobha.sivaprasad@nhs.net.
Moorfields Eye Hospital · GBBoehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DEUniversity College London · GBBradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBFrimley Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBJames Paget University Hospital · GBKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GBNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBRoyal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital NHS Trust · GBSouth Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo study associations of optical coherence tomography (OCT) features with presenting visual acuity (VA) in treatment naive neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

methodsPatients with nAMD initiated on aflibercept therapy were recruited from December 2019 to August 2021. Demographic and OCT (Spectralis, Heidelberg Engineering) features associated with good VA (VA ≥ 68 ETDRS letters, Snellen ≥ 6/12) and poor VA (VA < 54 letters, Snellen < 6/18) were analysed using Generalised Estimating Equations to account for inter-eye correlation.

resultsOf 2274 eyes of 2128 patients enrolled, 2039 eyes of 1901 patients with complete data were analysed. Mean age was 79.4 (SD 7.8) years, female:male 3:2 and mean VA 58.0 (SD 14.5) letters. On multivariable analysis VA < 54 letters was associated with increased central subfield thickness (CST) (OR 1.40 per 100 µm; P < 0.001), foveal intraretinal fluid (OR 2.14; P < 0.001), polypoidal vasculopathy (PCV) relative to Type 1 macular neovascularisation (MNV) (OR 1.66; P = 0.049), presence of foveal subretinal hyperreflective material (SHRM) (OR 1.73; P = 0.002), foveal fibrosis (OR 3.85; P < 0.001), foveal atrophy (OR 5.54; P < 0.001), loss of integrity of the foveal ellipsoid zone (EZ) or external limiting membrane (ELM) relative to their preservation (OR 3.83; P < 0.001) and absence of subretinal drusenoid deposits (SDD) (presence vs absence; OR 0.75; P = 0.04). These features were associated with reduced odds of VA ≥ 68 letters except MNV subtypes and SDD.

conclusionPresence of baseline fovea-involving atrophy, fibrosis, intraretinal fluid, SHRM, PCV EZ/ELM loss and increased CST determine poor presenting VA. This highlights the need for early detection and treatment prior to structural changes that worsen baseline VA.

Indexed as

Macular DegenerationWet Macular DegenerationAgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsAtrophyFemaleFibrosisFluorescein AngiographyHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMaleRanibizumabTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual AcuityAngiogenesis InhibitorsRanibizumab

Identifiers

PMID37853106
PMCPMC10920623
OpenAlexW4387730705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.