Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37853088›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Relative lateral wall thickness is an improved predictor for postoperative lateral wall fracture after trochanteric femoral fracture osteosynthesis.

Kenneth P van Knegsel, C-E Hsu, K-C Huang, Emir Benca, Torsten Pastor, Bergita Ganse, Peter Varga, Boyko Gueorguiev, Matthias Knobe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Research progress on weak state of lateral wall in intertrochanteric fractures].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kenneth P van Knegsel *Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Spitalstraβe 16, 6000, Lucerne, Switzerland. Kennethpetrus.vanknegsel@uzh.ch.
C-E Hsu *Department of Orthopedics, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
K-C HuangDepartment of Orthopedics, Asia University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Emir BencaAO Research Institute Davos, Clavadelerstrasse 8, 7270, Davos, Switzerland.
Torsten PastorDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Spitalstraβe 16, 6000, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Bergita GanseWerner Siemens Foundation Endowed Chair for Innovative Implant Development, Clinics and Institutes of Surgery, Saarland University, 66421, Homburg, Germany.
Peter VargaAO Research Institute Davos, Clavadelerstrasse 8, 7270, Davos, Switzerland.
Boyko GueorguievAO Research Institute Davos, Clavadelerstrasse 8, 7270, Davos, Switzerland.
Matthias KnobeMedical Faculty, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lateral wall thickness is a known predictor for postoperative stability of trochanteric femoral fractures and occurrence of secondary lateral wall fractures. Currently, the AO/OTA classification relies on the absolute lateral wall thickness (aLWT) to distinguish between stable A1.3 and unstable A2.1 fractures that does not take interpersonal patient differences into account. Thus, a more individualized and accurate measure would be favorable. Therefore, we proposed and validated a new patient-specific measure-the relative lateral wall thickness (rLWT)-to consider individualized measures and hypothesized its higher sensitivity and specificity compared with aLWT. First, in 146 pelvic radiographs of patients without a trochanteric femoral fracture, the symmetry of both caput-collum-diaphyseal angle (CCD) and total trochanteric thickness (TTT) was assessed to determine whether the contralateral side can be used for rLWT determination. Then, data of 202 patients were re-evaluated to compare rLWT versus previously published aLWT. Bilateral symmetry was found for both CCD and TTT (p ≥ 0.827), implying that bone morphology and geometry of the contralateral intact side could be used to calculate rLWT. Validation revealed increased accuracy of the rLWT compared with the gold standard aLWT, with increased specificity by 3.5% (Number Needed to Treat = 64 patients) and sensitivity by 1% (Number Needed to Treat = 75 patients). The novel rLWT is a more accurate and individualized predictor of secondary lateral wall fractures compared with the standard aLWT. This study established the threshold of 50.5% rLWT as a reference value for predicting fracture stability in trochanteric femoral fractures.

Indexed as

Bone ScrewsHip FracturesFemurFracture Fixation, InternalHumansTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID37853088
PMCPMC10584855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.