Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37853087›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Numerical simulation and experiment of double chamber brake based on CFD.

Liu Yuhao, Qu Pu, Li Qiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Liu YuhaoSchool of mechanical and electrical engineering, North University of China, Taiyuan, 030051, China. sz202101029@st.nuc.edu.cn.
Qu PuSchool of mechanical and electrical engineering, North University of China, Taiyuan, 030051, China.
Li QiangSchool of mechanical and electrical engineering, North University of China, Taiyuan, 030051, China.

Funding

The Aeronautical Science Foundation 2019290U0003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The artillery firing process will instantly produce high-temperature and high-pressure gunpowder gas, this process will produce shock waves. The gunpowder gas has a limited effect on the projectile during the firing and ballistic after-effects period, however, it has a very obvious effect on the stability of the gun body, and the reduction of the stability of the gun body directly affects the firing accuracy and the safety of the firing personnel. Based on the method of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), numerical simulation is carried out, and the structure and flow parameters of the muzzle flow field are obtained by using three-dimensional Euler's control equation, gas equation of state, and k-epsilon model, as well as dynamic mesh technology. By comparing the flow parameters of the brake before and after optimization, and analyzing the results obtained from the 8-round firing experiments, the efficiency of the optimized brake is increased by 8.2%, and the deviation between the experimental data and the simulation results is only 10.5%, which not only verifies the accuracy of the numerical simulation calculations but also verifies the optimized brake's good retracting effect. The results of the study can provide a reference for the optimization and design of the double-chamber brake.

Identifiers

PMID37853087
PMCPMC10584826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.