ArticleScientific reports2023
Lung microbiome on admission in critically ill patients with acute bacterial and viral pneumonia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of ResB supplementation on gut microbiome composition in elderly pneumonia: a randomized pilot trial.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Article
- The human lung microbiome progressively diminishes in the distal alveolar regions.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2026Article
- Bronchoalveolar Lavage Microbiota in Critically Ill Patients with Aspiration Pneumonia: An Exploratory Comparison with Community-Acquired Pneumonia and Analysis ofInfection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Differences in pulmonary microbiota of severe community-acquired pneumonia with different pathogenic microorganisms in children.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Respiratory dysbiosis as prognostic biomarker of disease severity for adults with community-acquired pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation.Pneumonia (Nathan Qld.) · 2025Article
- Distinct relative abundances in pathogens detected in mechanically ventilated patients with suspected pneumonia in the intensive care unit at King Abdulaziz University Hospital.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Swine influenza-modified pulmonary microbiota.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Microbiome-Mucosal Immunity Nexus: Driving Forces in Respiratory Disease Progression.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2024Review
- Microbiota and Immunity during Respiratory Infections: Lung and Gut Affair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Composition of pulmonary microbiome of patients with severe pneumonia is poorly known. The aim of this work was to analyse the lung microbiome of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with severe community acquired pneumonia (CAP) between 2019 and 2021 in comparison with a control group of 6 patients undergoing digestive surgery. As a second objective, the diagnostic capabilities of metagenomics was also studied in a small group of selected patients. The lung microbiome of patients with viral (5 with Influenza A and 8 with SARS-CoV-2) pneumonia at admission showed a similar diversity as the control group (p = 0.140 and p = 0.213 respectively). Contrarily, the group of 12 patients with pneumococcal pneumonia showed a significant lower Simpson´s index (p = 0.002). In the control group (n = 6) Proteobacteria (36.6%), Firmicutes (24.2%) and Actinobacteria (23.0%) were the predominant phyla. In SARS-CoV-2 patients (n = 8), there was a predominance of Proteobacteria (mean 41.6%) (Moraxella and Pelomonas at the genus level), Actinobacteria (24.6%) (Microbacterium) and Firmicutes (22.8%) mainly Streptococcus, Staphylococcus and Veillonella. In patients with Influenza A pneumonia (n = 5) there was a predominance of Firmicutes (35.1%) mainly Streptococcus followed by Proteobacteria (29.2%) (Moraxella, Acinetobacter and Pelomonas). In the group of pneumococcal pneumonia (n = 12) two phyla predominated: Firmicutes (53.1%) (Streptococcus) and Proteobacteria (36.5%) (Haemophilus). In the 7 patients with non-pneumococcal bacterial pneumonia Haemophilus influenzae (n = 2), Legionella pneumophila (n = 2), Klebsiella pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes and Leptospira were detected by metagenomics, confirming the diagnosis done using conventional microbiological techniques. The diversity of the respiratory microbiome in patients with severe viral pneumonia at ICU admission was similar to that of the control group. Contrarily, patients with pneumococcal pneumonia showed a lower grade of diversity. At initial stages of SARS-CoV-2 infection, no important alterations in the pulmonary microbiome were observed. The analysis of bacterial microbiome showed promising results as a diagnostic tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.