Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37853012›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Goodness-of-fit testing for meta-analysis of rare binary events.

Ming Zhang, Olivia Y Xiao, Johan Lim, Xinlei Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ming ZhangDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas, 75205, USA.
Olivia Y XiaoHighland Park High School, Dallas, Texas, 75205, USA.
Johan LimDepartment of Statistics, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Korea.
Xinlei WangDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas, 75205, USA. xinlei.wang@uta.edu.

Funding

Normalizing Gene Expression Data from Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded SamplesR15GM131390 · NIGMS · SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, XINLEI · 2019 to 2019
$432k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM131390NIH HHS R15GM131390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Random-effects (RE) meta-analysis is a crucial approach for combining results from multiple independent studies that exhibit heterogeneity. Recently, two frequentist goodness-of-fit (GOF) tests were proposed to assess the fit of RE model. However, they tend to perform poorly when assessing rare binary events. Under a general binomial-normal framework, we propose a novel GOF test for the meta-analysis of rare events. Our method is based on pivotal quantities that play an important role in Bayesian model assessment. It further adopts the Cauchy combination idea proposed in a 2019 JASA paper, to combine dependent p-values computed using posterior samples from Markov Chain Monte Carlo. The advantages of our method include clear conception and interpretation, incorporation of all data including double zeros without the need for artificial correction, well-controlled Type I error, and generally improved ability in detecting model misfits compared to previous GOF methods. We illustrate the proposed method via simulation and three real data applications.

Identifiers

PMID37853012
PMCPMC10584850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.