Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37852772›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Developing a machine learning algorithm to predict the probability of aseptic loosening of the glenoid component after anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty: protocol for a retrospective, multicentre study.

Arno Alexander Macken, Loïc C Macken, Jacobien H F Oosterhoff, Pascal Boileau, George S Athwal, Job N Doornberg, Laurent Lafosse, Thibault Lafosse, Michel P J van den Bekerom, Geert Alexander Buijze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Arno Alexander MackenDepartment of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands arnomacken@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7513-7437
Loïc C MackenFaculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jacobien H F OosterhoffDepartment of Engineering Systems and Services, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Pascal BoileauInstitut de Chirurgie Réparatrice, Locomoteur & Sport, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France.
George S AthwalRoth McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Center, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, Ontario, Canada.
Job N DoornbergOrthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Laurent LafosseAlps Surgery Institute, Clinique Generale Annecy, Annecy, France.
Thibault LafosseAlps Surgery Institute, Clinique Generale Annecy, Annecy, France.
Michel P J van den BekeromDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Geert Alexander BuijzeAlps Surgery Institute, Clinique Generale Annecy, Annecy, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite technological advancements in recent years, glenoid component loosening remains a common complication after anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA) and is one of the main causes of revision surgery. Increasing emphasis is placed on the prevention of glenoid component failure. Previous studies have successfully predicted range of motion, patient-reported outcomes and short-term complications after ATSA using machine learning methods, but an accurate predictive model for (glenoid component) revision is currently lacking. This study aims to use a large international database to accurately predict aseptic loosening of the glenoid component after ATSA using machine learning algorithms. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: For this multicentre, retrospective study, individual patient data will be compiled from previously published studies reporting revision of ATSA. A systematic literature search will be performed in Medline (PubMed) identifying all studies reporting outcomes of ATSA. Authors will be contacted and invited to participate in the Machine Learning Consortium by sharing their anonymised databases. All databases reporting revisions after ATSA will be included, and individual patients with a follow-up less than 2 years or a fracture as the indication for ATSA will be excluded. First, features (predictive variables) will be identified using a random forest feature selection. The resulting features from the compiled database will be used to train various machine learning algorithms (stochastic gradient boosting, random forest, support vector machine, neural network and elastic-net penalised logistic regression). The developed and validated algorithms will be evaluated across discrimination (c-statistic), calibration, the Brier score and the decision curve analysis. The best-performing algorithm will be used to create an open-access online prediction tool. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Data will be collected adhering to the WHO regulation on data sharing. An Institutional Review Board review is not applicable. The study results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, ShoulderHumansMachine LearningMulticenter Studies as TopicProbabilityRetrospective StudiesScapulaTreatment OutcomeClinical Decision-MakingHealth informaticsORTHOPAEDIC & TRAUMA SURGERYRisk FactorsShoulder

Identifiers

PMID37852772
PMCPMC10603397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.