Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37852762›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

UK robotic arthroplasty clinical and cost effectiveness randomised controlled trial for hips (RACER-Hip): a study protocol.

James Griffin, Edward T Davis, Helen Parsons, Siobhan Stevens, Helen Bradley, Julie Bruce, David R Ellard, Fares Haddad, Charles E Hutchinson, James Mason and 10 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Direct anterior approach with conventional instruments versus robotic posterolateral approach in elective total hip replacement for primary osteoarthritis: a case-control study.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

James GriffinWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK james.griffin@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6364-0414
Edward T DavisRoyal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Helen ParsonsWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2765-3728
Siobhan StevensWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Helen BradleyWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Julie BruceWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8462-7999
David R EllardWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2992-048X
Fares HaddadDepartment of Orthopaedics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Charles E HutchinsonUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
James MasonWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Henry NwankwoWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Andrew MetcalfeWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4515-8202
Toby SmithWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Jennifer SmithPatient Representative, Coventry, UK.
Jane WarwickWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
John A SkinnerLimb Reconstruction Unit, The Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.
Sophie ReesBristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4399-2049
Martin UnderwoodWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0309-1708
Chetan KhatriWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3961-1314
Peter David Henry WallRoyal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3149-3373

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe number of robotic-assisted hip replacement procedures has expanded globally with the intended aim of improving outcomes. Intraoperative robotic-arm systems add additional costs to total hip replacement (THR) surgery but may improve surgical precision and could contribute to diminished pain and improved function. Additionally, these systems may reduce the need for expensive revision surgery. Surgery with conventional instruments may be just as successful, quick and affordable. There is timely demand for a robust evaluation of this technology. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Robotic Arthroplasty Clinical and cost Effectiveness Randomised controlled trial for Hips (RACER-Hip) is a multicentre (minimum of six UK sites), participant-assessor blinded, randomised controlled trial. 378 participants with hip osteoarthritis requiring THR will be randomised (1:1) to receive robotic-assisted THR, or THR using conventional surgical instruments. The primary outcome is the Forgotten Joint Score at 12 months post-randomisation; a patient-reported outcome measure assessing participants' awareness of their joint when undertaking daily activities. Secondary outcomes will be collected post-operatively (pain, blood loss and opioid usage) and at 3, 6, 12, 24 months, then 5 and 10 years postrandomisation (including function, pain, health-related quality of life, reoperations and satisfaction). Allocation concealment will be accomplished using a computer-based randomisation procedure on the day of surgery. Blinding methods include the use of sham incisions for marker clusters and blinded operation notes. The primary analysis will adhere to the intention-to-treat principle. Results will adhere to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statements. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial was approved by an ethics committee (Solihull Research Ethics Committee, 30 June 2021, IRAS: 295831). Participants will provide informed consent before agreeing to participate. Results will be disseminated using peer-reviewed journal publications, presentations at international conferences and through the use of social media. We will develop plans to disseminate to patients and public with our patient partners. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN13374625.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipRobotic Surgical ProceduresCost-Effectiveness AnalysisHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPainQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeUnited Kingdomhiporthopaedic & trauma surgeryrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID37852762
PMCPMC10603453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.