Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37852737›Full record

Trial reportJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2023

Phase II trial of nivolumab and metformin in patients with treatment-refractory microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer.

Mehmet Akce, Batoul Farran, Jeffrey M Switchenko, Manali Rupji, Sandra Kang, Lana Khalil, Amanda Ruggieri-Joyce, Brian Olson, Walid L Shaib, Christina Wu and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Mehmet AkceDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA makce@uabmc.edu.
Batoul FarranDepartment of Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1517-6490
Jeffrey M SwitchenkoBiostatistics Shared Resource, Emory University Winship Cancer institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Manali RupjiBiostatistics Shared Resource, Emory University Winship Cancer institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Sandra KangDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Lana KhalilDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Amanda Ruggieri-JoyceDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Brian OlsonDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Walid L ShaibNorthwest Georgia Oncology Centers Wellstar, Marietta, Georgia, USA.
Christina WuDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
Olatunji B AleseDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Maria DiabDepartment of Internal Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Gregory B LesinskiDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8787-7678
Bassel F El-RayesDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Emory University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USHenry Ford Health System · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USNorthwest Behavioral Medicine · US

Funding

XRAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA013148 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Robert S Welner · 1985 to 2026
$165.9M
Winship Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA138292 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Suresh S Ramalingam · 2009 to 2026
$47.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA013148NCI NIH HHS P30 CA138292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreclinical studies showed metformin reduces exhaustion of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and potentiates programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) blockade. We hypothesized that metformin with nivolumab would elicit potent antitumor and immune modulatory activity in metastatic microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC). We evaluated this hypothesis in a phase II study.

methodsNivolumab (480 mg) was administered intravenously every 4 weeks while metformin (1000 mg) was given orally, two times per day following a 14-day metformin only lead-in phase. Patients ≥18 years of age, with previously treated, stage IV MSS CRC, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0-1, having received no prior anti-PD-1 agent were eligible. The primary endpoint was overall response rate with secondary endpoints of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Correlative studies using paired pretreatment/on-treatment biopsies and peripheral blood evaluated a series of immune biomarkers in the tumor microenvironment and systemic circulation using ChipCytometry and flow cytometry.

resultsA total of 24 patients were enrolled, 6 patients were replaced per protocol, 18 patients had evaluable disease. Of the 18 evaluable patients, 11/18 (61%) were women and the median age was 58 (IQR 50-67). Two patients had stable disease, but no patients had objective response, hence the study was stopped for futility. Median OS and PFS was 5.2 months (95% CI (3.2 to 11.7)) and 2.3 months (95% CI (1.7 to 2.3)). Most common grade 3/4 toxicities: Anemia (n=2), diarrhea (n=2), and fever (n=2). Metformin alone failed to increase the infiltration of T-cell subsets in the tumor, but combined metformin and nivolumab increased percentages of tumor-infiltrating leukocytes (p=0.031). Dual treatment also increased Tim3+ levels in patient tissues and decreased naïve CD8+T cells (p=0.0475).

conclusionsNivolumab and metformin were well tolerated in patients with MSS CRC but had no evidence of efficacy. Correlative studies did not reveal an appreciable degree of immune modulation from metformin alone, but showed trends in tumorous T-cell infiltration as a result of dual metformin and PD-1 blockade despite progression in a majority of patients.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsMetforminFemaleHumansMaleMicrosatellite RepeatsMiddle AgedNivolumabProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorTumor MicroenvironmentMetforminNivolumabProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicDrug Therapy, CombinationImmunotherapyTranslational Medical Research

Identifiers

PMID37852737
PMCPMC10603338
OpenAlexW4387748266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.