ArticleACS applied materials & interfaces2023
Identification of Lithium Compounds on Surfaces of Lithium Metal Anode with Machine-Learning-Assisted Analysis of ToF-SIMS Spectra.
Article in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lithium-Germanium Alloy Interfaces for Efficient Low-Pressure Ammonia Synthesis.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Article
- Toward AI ecosystems for electrolyte and interface engineering in solid-state batteries.Science advances · 2025Review
- Generating and leveraging explanations of AI/ML models in materials and manufacturing research.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Review
- ToF-SIMS sputter depth profiling of interphases and coatings on lithium metal surfaces.Communications chemistry · 2025Article
- The Application of a Random Forest Classifier to ToF-SIMS Imaging Data.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2024Article
- Secondary Ion Mass Spectral Imaging of Metals and Alloys.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Detailed knowledge about contamination and passivation compounds on the surface of lithium metal anodes (LMAs) is essential to enable their use in all-solid-state batteries (ASSBs). Time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS), a highly surface-sensitive technique, can be used to reliably characterize the surface status of LMAs. However, as ToF-SIMS data are usually highly complex, manual data analysis can be difficult and time-consuming. In this study, machine learning techniques, especially logistic regression (LR), are used to identify the characteristic secondary ions of 5 different pure lithium compounds. Furthermore, these models are applied to the mixture and LMA samples to enable identification of their compositions based on the measured ToF-SIMS spectra. This machine-learning-based analysis approach shows good performance in identifying characteristic ions of the analyzed compounds that fit well with their chemical nature. Moreover, satisfying accuracy in identifying the compositions of unseen new samples is achieved. In addition, the scope and limitations of such a strategy in practical applications are discussed. This work presents a robust analytical method that can assist researchers in simplifying the analysis of the studied lithium compound samples, offering the potential for broader applications in other material systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.