Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37852174›Full record

ReviewCell reports. Medicine2023

Artificial intelligence education: An evidence-based medicine approach for consumers, translators, and developers.

Faye Yu Ci Ng, Arun James Thirunavukarasu, Haoran Cheng, Ting Fang Tan, Laura Gutierrez, Yanyan Lan, Jasmine Chiat Ling Ong, Yap Seng Chong, Kee Yuan Ngiam, Dean Ho and 6 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell reports. Medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. [Medical education and artificial intelligence: perspectives and ethical challenges].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. AI In Leukemia Diagnostics: Complementing the Pathologist's Role.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Artificial Intelligence Competencies and Educational Needs Among ERNICA Members: Results of a Multinational Survey.European journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery ... [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Reimagining pharmacology education.Pharmacological reviews · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Faye Yu Ci NgArtificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Center, Singapore Health Service, Singapore, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Arun James ThirunavukarasuArtificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Center, Singapore Health Service, Singapore, Singapore; University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK; Oxford University Clinical Academic Graduate School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Haoran ChengArtificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Center, Singapore Health Service, Singapore, Singapore; Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA; Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Ting Fang TanArtificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Center, Singapore Health Service, Singapore, Singapore.
Laura GutierrezArtificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Center, Singapore Health Service, Singapore, Singapore.
Yanyan LanInstitute for AI Industry Research (AIR), Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Jasmine Chiat Ling OngDepartment of Pharmacy, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Yap Seng ChongYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; Dean's Office, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Kee Yuan NgiamYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Dean HoBiomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; Insitute for Digital Medicine (WisDM), N.1 Institute for Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; Department of Pharmacology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Tien Yin WongTsinghua Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Kenneth KwekChief Executive Office, Singapore General Hospital, SingHealth, Singapore, Singapore.
Finale Doshi-VelezHarvard Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Catherine LuceyExecutive Vice Chancellor and Provost Office, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Thomas CoffmanDuke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Daniel Shu Wei TingArtificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Center, Singapore Health Service, Singapore, Singapore; Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA. Electronic address: daniel.ting@duke-nus.edu.sg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current and future healthcare professionals are generally not trained to cope with the proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) technology in healthcare. To design a curriculum that caters to variable baseline knowledge and skills, clinicians may be conceptualized as "consumers", "translators", or "developers". The changes required of medical education because of AI innovation are linked to those brought about by evidence-based medicine (EBM). We outline a core curriculum for AI education of future consumers, translators, and developers, emphasizing the links between AI and EBM, with suggestions for how teaching may be integrated into existing curricula. We consider the key barriers to implementation of AI in the medical curriculum: time, resources, variable interest, and knowledge retention. By improving AI literacy rates and fostering a translator- and developer-enriched workforce, innovation may be accelerated for the benefit of patients and practitioners.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEducation, MedicalCurriculumEvidence-Based MedicineHumansartificial intelligencecurriculumdigital healthevidence-based medicinemedical educationmedical schoolmedical trainingteaching

Identifiers

PMID37852174
PMCPMC10591047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.