Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37851667›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2023

Environmental sampling for typhoidal Salmonellas in household and surface waters in Nepal identifies potential transmission pathways.

Christopher LeBoa, Sneha Shrestha, Jivan Shakya, Shiva Ram Naga, Sony Shrestha, Mudita Shakya, Alexander T Yu, Rajeev Shrestha, Krista Vaidya, Nishan Katuwal and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Multidrug-ResistantPolish journal of microbiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Christopher LeBoaStanford University, Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2128-9187
Sneha ShresthaResearch and Development Division, Dhulikhel Hospital Kathmandu University Hospital, Kavre, Nepal.
Jivan ShakyaInstitute for Research in Science and Technology, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Shiva Ram NagaResearch and Development Division, Dhulikhel Hospital Kathmandu University Hospital, Kavre, Nepal.
Sony ShresthaResearch and Development Division, Dhulikhel Hospital Kathmandu University Hospital, Kavre, Nepal.
Mudita ShakyaResearch and Development Division, Dhulikhel Hospital Kathmandu University Hospital, Kavre, Nepal.
Alexander T YuStanford University, Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Rajeev ShresthaResearch and Development Division, Dhulikhel Hospital Kathmandu University Hospital, Kavre, Nepal.
Krista VaidyaResearch and Development Division, Dhulikhel Hospital Kathmandu University Hospital, Kavre, Nepal.
Nishan KatuwalResearch and Development Division, Dhulikhel Hospital Kathmandu University Hospital, Kavre, Nepal.
Kristen AiemjoyUniversity of California Davis, Division of Public Health Sciences, California, United States of America.
Isaac I BogochToronto General Hospital, Division of Infectious Diseases, Toronto, Canada, and Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto Canada.
Christopher B UzzellImperial College London, School of Public Health, Norfolk Place, London, United Kingdom.
Denise O GarrettSabin Vaccine Institute, Applied Epidemiology Section, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Stephen P LubyStanford University, Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Jason R AndrewsStanford University, Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Dipesh TamrakarResearch and Development Division, Dhulikhel Hospital Kathmandu University Hospital, Kavre, Nepal.
Dhulikhel Hospital · NPStanford University · USImperial College London · GBMahidol University · THNepal Development Research Institute · NPSabin Vaccine Institute · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Research Mentoring and Building Capacity of underrepresented Minority Research Scientists in India.D43TW010540 · FIC · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MICHELE BARRY, Eva Harris · 2017 to 2026
$15.5M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW010540
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSalmonella Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi, fecal-oral transmitted bacterium, have temporally and geographically heterogeneous pathways of transmission. Previous work in Kathmandu, Nepal implicated stone waterspouts as a dominant transmission pathway after 77% of samples tested positive for Salmonella Typhi and 70% for Salmonella Paratyphi. Due to a falling water table, these spouts no longer provide drinking water, but typhoid fever persists, and the question of the disease's dominant pathway of transmission remains unanswered.

methodsWe used environmental surveillance to detect Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi A DNA from potential sources of transmission. We collected 370, 1L drinking water samples from a population-based random sample of households in the Kathmandu and Kavre Districts of Nepal between February and October 2019. Between November 2019 and July 2021, we collected 380, 50mL river water samples from 19 sentinel sites on a monthly interval along the rivers leading through the Kathmandu and Kavre Districts. We processed drinking water samples using a single qPCR and processed river water samples using differential centrifugation and qPCR at 0 and after 16 hours of liquid culture enrichment. A 3-cycle threshold (Ct) decrease of Salmonella Typhi or Salmonella Paratyphi, pre- and post-enrichment, was used as evidence of growth. We also performed structured observations of human-environment interactions to understand pathways of potential exposure.

resultsAmong 370 drinking water samples, Salmonella Typhi was detected in 7 samples (1.8%) and Salmonella Paratyphi A was detected in 4 (1.0%) samples. Among 380 river water samples, Salmonella Typhi was detected in 171 (45%) and Salmonella Paratyphi A was detected in 152 (42%) samples. Samples located upstream of the Kathmandu city center were positive for Salmonella Typhi 12% of the time while samples from locations in and downstream were positive 58% and 67% of the time respectively. Individuals were observed bathing, washing clothes, and washing vegetables in the rivers. IMPLICATIONS: These results suggest that drinking water was not the dominant pathway of transmission of Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi A in the Kathmandu Valley in 2019. The high degree of river water contamination and its use for washing vegetables raises the possibility that river systems represent an important source of typhoid exposure in Kathmandu.

Indexed as

Drinking WaterTyphoid FeverHumansNepalSalmonella paratyphi ASalmonella typhiDrinking Water

Identifiers

PMID37851667
PMCPMC10615262
OpenAlexW4387737034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.