Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37851603›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Status of countrywide laboratory services quality and capacity in primary healthcare facilities in Tanzania: Findings from Star Rating Assessment.

Erick Kinyenje, Ruth R Ngowi, Yohanes S Msigwa, Joseph C Hokororo, Talhiya A Yahya, Chrisogone J German, Akili Mawazo, Mohamed A Mohamed, Omary A Nassoro, Mbwana M Degeh and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Erick KinyenjeHealth Quality Assurance Unit, Ministry of Health, Dodoma, Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8434-2232
Ruth R NgowiHealth Quality Assurance Unit, Ministry of Health, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Yohanes S MsigwaHealth Quality Assurance Unit, Ministry of Health, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Joseph C HokororoHealth Quality Assurance Unit, Ministry of Health, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Talhiya A YahyaManagement Science for Health, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Chrisogone J GermanHealth Quality Assurance Unit, Ministry of Health, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Akili MawazoDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Mohamed A MohamedTanzania Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Programme (TFELTP), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Omary A NassoroHealth Quality Assurance Unit, Ministry of Health, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Mbwana M DegehHealth Quality Assurance Unit, Ministry of Health, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Radenta P BahegwaHealth Quality Assurance Unit, Ministry of Health, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Laura E MaranduHealth Quality Assurance Unit, Ministry of Health, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Syabo M MwaisengelaHealth Quality Assurance Unit, Ministry of Health, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Lutengano W MwangindeTanzania Police Force, Forensic Bureau, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Robert MakalaRegional Administrative Secretary's Office-Regional Health Management Team, Manyara, Tanzania.
Eliudi S EliakimuHealth Quality Assurance Unit, Ministry of Health, Dodoma, Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2383-9530

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate disease diagnosis relies on a well-organized and reliable laboratory system. This study assesses the quality of laboratory services in Tanzania based on the nationwide Star Rating Assessment (SRA) of Primary Healthcare (PHC) facilities conducted in 2017/18. This cross-sectional study utilized secondary data from all the country's PHC facilities stored in the SRA database. Laboratory service quality was assessed by aggregating scores as percentages of the maximum achievable score across various indicators: dedicated laboratory department/room, adequate equipment, staffing levels, adherence to testing protocols, establishment of turnaround times, internal and external quality controls, and safety and supplies management. Scores equal to or exceeding 80% were deemed compliant. Multiple linear regression was used to determine the influence of facility characteristics (level, ownership, location, staffing) on quality scores, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. The study included 6,663 PHC facilities (85.9% dispensaries, 11% health centers, 3.2% hospital-level-1), with the majority being public (82.3% vs. 17.7%) and located in rural areas (77.1% vs. 22.9%). On average, facilities scored 30.8% (SD = 35.7), and only 26.6% met staffing requirements. Compliance with quality standards was higher in private (63% vs. 19%, p<0.001) and urban facilities (62% vs. 16%, p<0.001). More than half of the facilities did not meet either of the eight quality indicators. Quality was positively linked to staffing compliance (Beta = 5.770) but negatively impacted by dispensaries (Beta = -6.342), rural locations (Beta = -0.945), and public ownership (Beta = -1.459). A score of 30% falls significantly short of the national target of 80%. Improving laboratory staffing levels at PHC facilities could improve the quality of laboratory services, especially in public facilities that are based in rural areas. There is a need to further strengthen laboratory services in PHC facilities to ensure the quality of laboratory services and clients' satisfaction.

Identifiers

PMID37851603
PMCPMC10584114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.