ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2024
Biomimetic Deep Learning Networks With Applications to Epileptic Spasms and Seizure Prediction.
Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence-assisted detection of epileptic spasms using electroencephalographic-video analysis.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- Review of Progress of AI in Biomimetics: From Biological Patterns to Closed-Loop Discovery.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a machine learning model to predict prognostic outcomes in infantile epileptic spasms syndrome.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- The role of electroencephalography in epilepsy research-From seizures to interictal activity and comorbidities.Epilepsia · 2025Review
- Delta-fast ripple coupling suppression: designing a brain-mimetic stimulation paradigm for seizure abolishment.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIn this study, we present a novel biomimetic deep learning network for epileptic spasms and seizure prediction and compare its performance with state-of-the-art conventional machine learning models.
methodsOur proposed model incorporates modular Volterra kernel convolutional networks and bidirectional recurrent networks in combination with the phase amplitude cross-frequency coupling features derived from scalp EEG. They are applied to the standard CHB-MIT dataset containing focal epilepsy episodes as well as two other datasets from the Montefiore Medical Center and the University of California Los Angeles that provide data of patients experiencing infantile spasm (IS) syndrome.
resultsOverall, in this study, the networks can produce accurate predictions (100%) and significant detection latencies (10 min). Furthermore, the biomimetic network outperforms conventional ones by producing no false positives. SIGNIFICANCE: Biomimetic neural networks utilize extensive knowledge about processing and learning in the electrical networks of the brain. Predicting seizures in adults can improve their quality of life. Epileptic spasms in infants are part of a particular seizure type that needs identifying when suspicious behaviors are noticed in babies. Predicting epileptic spasms within a given time frame (the prediction horizon) suggests their existence and allows an epileptologist to flag an EEG trace for future review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.