ArticleJournal of biomechanical engineering2024
How Important is Position in Adaptive Treadmill Control?
Article in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual-task gait assessment using n-back testing during self-paced treadmill walking in virtual reality: reliability and baseline characterisation for future clinical application.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Walking speed can be modulated on an adaptive split-belt treadmill.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To more closely mimic overground walking, researchers are developing adaptive treadmills (ATMs) that update belt speed in real-time based on user gait mechanics. Many existing ATM control schemes are solely based on position on the belt and do not respond to changes in gait mechanics, like propulsive forces, that result in increased overground walking speed. To target natural causal mechanisms to alter speed, we developed an ATM controller that adjusts speed via changes in position, step length, and propulsion. Gains on each input dictate the impact of the corresponding parameter on belt speed. The study objective was to determine the effect of modifying the position gain on self-selected walking speed, measures of propulsion, and step length. Twenty-two participants walked at their self-selected speed with four ATM controllers, each with a unique position gain. Walking speed, anterior and posterior ground reaction force peaks and impulses, net impulse, and step length were compared between conditions. Smaller position gains promoted more equivalent anterior and posterior impulses, resulting in a net impulse closer to zero (p = 0.0043), a characteristic of healthy gait. Walking speed, anterior and posterior ground reaction force peaks and impulses, and step length did not change between conditions (all p > 0.05). These results suggest that reducing the importance of position in the ATM controller may promote more balanced anterior and posterior impulses, possibly improving the efficacy of the ATM for gait rehabilitation by emphasizing changes in gait mechanics instead of position to naturally adjust speed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.