Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37851498›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2023

Testing a Model of Care for Patients on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Based on Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes: Protocol for a Randomized Phase II Controlled Trial.

André Manuel da Silva Lopes, Sara Colomer-Lahiguera, Célia Darnac, Stellio Giacomini, Sébastien Bugeia, Garance Gutknecht, Gilliosa Spurrier-Bernard, Michel Cuendet, Fanny Muet, Veronica Aedo-Lopez and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05530187 (Testing a Model of Care Based on Electronic Patient Reported Outcome Monitoring for Patients With Cancer Under Immune-checkpoint Blockade), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05530187 naunknown statusnot on this map

Testing a Model of Care Based on Electronic Patient Reported Outcome Monitoring for Patients With Cancer Under Immune-checkpoint Blockade: A Phase II Study (IePRO Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorManuela EicherRan2021 to 2023Enrolled198ConditionsPatient Reported Outcome Measures, Patient SafetyArmsElectronic Patient-reported Outcomes-based Model of Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Learning about and living with toxicity: a qualitative study of patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors for melanoma or lung cancer and their caregivers.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

André Manuel da Silva Lopes *Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1463-9609
Sara Colomer-Lahiguera *Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2390-5198
Célia Darnac *Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6646-4647
Stellio Giacomini *Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6972-5136
Sébastien Bugeia *Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4304-1554
Garance Gutknecht *Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0053-4532
Gilliosa Spurrier-Bernard *MelanomeFrance, Teilhet, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0233-7275
Michel Cuendet *Precision Oncology Center, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0754-3425
Fanny Muet *Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8545-3809
Veronica Aedo-Lopez *Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0629-4508
Nuria Mederos *Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3083-0721
Olivier Michielin *Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4926-6355
Alfredo Addeo *Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0988-0828
Sofiya Latifyan *Precision Oncology Center, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5117-069X
Manuela Eicher *Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7691-0719
University of Lausanne · CHUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManagement of severe symptomatic immune-related adverse events (IrAEs) related to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can be facilitated by timely detection. As patients face a heterogeneous set of symptoms outside the clinical setting, remotely monitoring and assessing symptoms by using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) may result in shorter delays between symptom onset and clinician detection.

objectiveWe assess the effect of a model of care for remote patient monitoring and symptom management based on PRO data on the time to detection of symptomatic IrAEs from symptom onset. The secondary objectives are to assess its effects on the time between symptomatic IrAE detection and intervention, IrAE grade (severity), health-related quality of life, self-efficacy, and overall survival at 6 months.

methodsFor this study, 198 patients with cancer receiving systemic treatment comprising ICIs exclusively will be recruited from 2 Swiss university hospitals. Patients are randomized (1:1) to a digital model of care (intervention) or usual care (control group). Patients are enrolled for 6 months, and they use an electronic app to complete weekly Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General questionnaire and PROMIS (PROs Measurement Information System) Self-Efficacy to Manage Symptoms questionnaires. The intervention patient group completes a standard set of 37 items in a weekly PROs version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) questionnaire, and active symptoms are reassessed daily for the first 3 months by using a modified 24-hour recall period. Patients can add items from the full PRO-CTCAE item library to their questionnaire. Nurses call patients in the event of new or worsening symptoms and manage them by using a standardized triage algorithm based on the United Kingdom Oncology Nursing Society 24-hour triage tool. This algorithm provides guidance on deciding if patients should receive in-person care, if monitoring should be increased, or if self-management education should be reinforced.

resultsThe Institut Suisse de Recherche Expérimentale sur le Cancer Foundation and Kaiku Health Ltd funded this study. Active recruitment began since November 2021 and is projected to conclude in November 2023. Trial results are expected to be published in the first quarter of 2024 and will be disseminated through publications submitted at international scientific conferences.

conclusionsThis trial is among the first trials to use PRO data to directly influence routine care of patients treated with ICIs and addresses some limitations in previous studies. This trial collects a wider spectrum of self-reported symptom data daily. There are some methodological limitations brought by changes in evolving treatment standards for patients with cancer. This trial's results could entail further academic discussions on the challenges of diagnosing and managing symptoms associated with treatment remotely by providing further insights into the burden symptoms represent to patients and highlight the complexity of care procedures involved in managing symptomatic IrAEs.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05530187; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05530187. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/48386.

Indexed as

cancerdetectioneHealthelectronic health recordhealth-related quality of lifeimmuneimmune-related adverse eventsmodel of caremonitoringpatient-reported outcomesquestionnaireremote symptom managementself-efficacyself-managementself-management supportsupportsymptomtelehealthtreatment

Identifiers

PMID37851498
PMCPMC10620631
OpenAlexW4386297160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.