ArticleJAMA cardiology2023
Deep Learning of Electrocardiograms in Sinus Rhythm From US Veterans to Predict Atrial Fibrillation.
Article in JAMA cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence for Cardiovascular Risk Prediction: An Umbrella Review of Applications and Translational Challenges.Vascular health and risk management · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in the Heart of Medicine: A Systematic Approach to Transforming Arrhythmia Care with Intelligent Systems.Current cardiology reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Deep learning prediction of left atrial structure and function from 12-lead electrocardiograms.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Performance of Vision-Enabled Large Language Models in Image-Based Electrocardiogram Interpretation: Exploratory Evaluation.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Prediction and Detection of Atrial Fibrillation from Sinus-Rhythm Electrocardiograms and Ambulatory Monitoring.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiography in Kidney Transplantation: Are We Ready to Rethink the Electrocardiogram?Kidney360 · 2026Article
- From innovation to implementation: Addressing the AI adoption gap in cardiac surgery.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Review
- CARDIAC-FM: A Multimodal Foundation Model for Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Using ECG and Cardiac MRI.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiography in Practice: A State-of-the-Art Review.Korean circulation journal · 2026Review
- Development and explanation of electrocardiogram-based deep learning for predicting short-term mortality in heart failure patients.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in arrhythmia risk prediction: connecting undetectable vulnerabilities and proactive care.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Applied to Electrocardiograms Recorded in Sinus Rhythm for Detection and Prediction of Atrial Fibrillation: A Scoping Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Early Detection and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: State-of-the-art Review.European cardiology · 2026Review
- Predicting Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Outcomes: Machine Learning Model Development and Validation Using a Large Administrative Claims Database.JMIR cardio · 2025Article
- Current State of Artificial Intelligence in Assessing Cardiac Function.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence-enabled analysis of handheld single-lead electrocardiograms to predict incident atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the VITAL-AF randomized trial.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- The global burden of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in older adults (≥ 65 years): trends, disparities, and drivers (1990-2021).BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiac Electrophysiology: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence-enabled sinus electrocardiograms for the detection of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation benchmarked against the CHARGE-AF score.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Article
- Short-term atrial fibrillation onset prediction using machine learning.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Early detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) may help prevent adverse cardiovascular events such as stroke. Deep learning applied to electrocardiograms (ECGs) has been successfully used for early identification of several cardiovascular diseases. Objective: To determine whether deep learning models applied to outpatient ECGs in sinus rhythm can predict AF in a large and diverse patient population. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prognostic study was performed on ECGs acquired from January 1, 1987, to December 31, 2022, at 6 US Veterans Affairs (VA) hospital networks and 1 large non-VA academic medical center. Participants included all outpatients with 12-lead ECGs in sinus rhythm. Main Outcomes and Measures: A convolutional neural network using 12-lead ECGs from 2 US VA hospital networks was trained to predict the presence of AF within 31 days of sinus rhythm ECGs. The model was tested on ECGs held out from training at the 2 VA networks as well as 4 additional VA networks and 1 large non-VA academic medical center. Results: A total of 907 858 ECGs from patients across 6 VA sites were included in the analysis. These patients had a mean (SD) age of 62.4 (13.5) years, 6.4% were female, and 93.6% were male, with a mean (SD) CHA2DS2-VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack or thromboembolism, vascular disease, age, sex category) score of 1.9 (1.6). A total of 0.2% were American Indian or Alaska Native, 2.7% were Asian, 10.7% were Black, 4.6% were Latinx, 0.7% were Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, 62.4% were White, 0.4% were of other race or ethnicity (which is not broken down into subcategories in the VA data set), and 18.4% were of unknown race or ethnicity. At the non-VA academic medical center (72 483 ECGs), the mean (SD) age was 59.5 (15.4) years and 52.5% were female, with a mean (SD) CHA2DS2-VASc score of 1.6 (1.4). A total of 0.1% were American Indian or Alaska Native, 7.9% were Asian, 9.4% were Black, 2.9% were Latinx, 0.03% were Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, 74.8% were White, 0.1% were of other race or ethnicity, and 4.7% were of unknown race or ethnicity. A deep learning model predicted the presence of AF within 31 days of a sinus rhythm ECG on held-out test ECGs at VA sites with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.85-0.86), accuracy of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.77-0.78), and F1 score of 0.30 (95% CI, 0.30-0.31). At the non-VA site, AUROC was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.93-0.94); accuracy, 0.87 (95% CI, 0.86-0.88); and F1 score, 0.46 (95% CI, 0.44-0.48). The model was well calibrated, with a Brier score of 0.02 across all sites. Among individuals deemed high risk by deep learning, the number needed to screen to detect a positive case of AF was 2.47 individuals for a testing sensitivity of 25% and 11.48 for 75%. Model performance was similar in patients who were Black, female, or younger than 65 years or who had CHA2DS2-VASc scores of 2 or greater. Conclusions and Relevance: Deep learning of outpatient sinus rhythm ECGs predicted AF within 31 days in populations with diverse demographics and comorbidities. Similar models could be used in future AF screening efforts to reduce adverse complications associated with this disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.