Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37851218›Full record

ArticleCancer treatment and research2023

Discussing Difficult News: Reframing Patient and Family Preferences Surrounding the Content and Style of Communication.

Eric Goodlev

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer treatment and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Eric GoodlevDepartment of Medicine, Section of Palliative Care, Einstein Medical Center Montgomery, East Norriton, PA, USA. Eric.Goodlev@jefferson.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uncomfortable conversations transcend medicine across all sites of care and at all stages of a serious illness. From discussion of prognosis or prognostic uncertainty, to evaluation of competing treatment options, to disclosure of medical errors, to consideration of potentially toxic treatments, clinicians must approach such conversations with sensitivity to a patient's cognitive, emotional, spiritual, and cultural needs. Conversations small and large may be seen as "difficult" by a patient or their family, and there may be discordant views of the perceived "difficulty" of a conversation from the perspective of the medical team as compared to the patient or family.

Indexed as

CommunicationPhysician-Patient RelationsHumansPrognosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.