Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37851187›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2023

Cognitive flexibility in a Tanganyikan bower-building cichlid, Aulonocranus dewindti.

Maëlan Tomasek, Midori Stark, Valérie Dufour, Alex Jordan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Decision rules diverge between sympatric Featherfin cichlids despite shared preferences, ecology, and evolutionary history.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maëlan TomasekCognitive and Social Ethology Team, UMR 7247, PRC, BAT 40, Campus CNRS, Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, INRAE, CNRS, IFCE, Université de Tours, 23 Rue de Loess, 67037, Strasbourg, France. maelan.tomasek@hotmail.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0879-1700
Midori StarkUniversity of Konstanz, 78464, Constance, Germany.
Valérie Dufour *Cognitive and Social Ethology Team, UMR 7247, PRC, BAT 40, Campus CNRS, Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, INRAE, CNRS, IFCE, Université de Tours, 23 Rue de Loess, 67037, Strasbourg, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1766-9598
Alex Jordan *University of Konstanz, 78464, Constance, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6131-9734

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive flexibility, the ability to modify one's decision rules to adapt to a new situation, has been extensively studied in many species. In fish, though, data on cognitive flexibility are scarce, especially in the wild. We studied a lekking species of cichlid fish in Lake Tanganyika, Aulonocranus dewindti. Males create sand bowers as spawning sites and maintain them by removing any objects falling into it. In the first part of our experiment, we investigated the existence of spontaneous decision rules for the maintenance of the bowers. We showed that if a snail shell and a stone are placed in their bower, fish prefer to remove the shell first. In the second phase of our experiment, we took advantage of this spontaneous decision rule to investigate whether this rule was flexible. We tested five individuals in a choice against preference task, in which the fish had to modify their preference rule and remove the stone first to be allowed to then remove the shell and have a clean bower. While there was no overall trend towards flexibility in this task, there was variation at an individual level. Some individuals increased their preference for removing the shell first, deciding quickly and with little exploration of the objects. Others were more successful at choosing against preference and showed behaviours suggesting self-regulatory inhibition abilities. Bower-building cichlids could therefore be a promising model to study cognitive flexibility, and other aspects of animal cognition in the wild.

Indexed as

CichlidsAnimalsCognitionMaleBehavioural inhibitionDecision rulesPreferenceTeleost cognitionWild animals

Identifiers

PMID37851187
PMCPMC10770232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.