Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37851129›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2023

Postoperative local interventions for the palate as a gingival graft donor area: a scoping review.

Ana Luiza Mustafé Silva, João Antônio Chaves de Souza, Túlio Eduardo Nogueira

Erratum issuedAbstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ana Luiza Mustafé SilvaFaculty of Dentistry, Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Goiás, CEP, Goiânia, Goiás, 74605-220, Brazil.
João Antônio Chaves de SouzaFaculty of Dentistry, Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Goiás, CEP, Goiânia, Goiás, 74605-220, Brazil.
Túlio Eduardo NogueiraFaculty of Dentistry, Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Goiás, CEP, Goiânia, Goiás, 74605-220, Brazil. tulio_nogueira@ufg.br.
Universidade Federal de Goiás · BR

Funding

Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás (FAPEG) Master's scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis scoping review aimed to systematically identify evidence-based interventions to stimulate healing or protect the harvested palate of patients undergoing gingival grafting. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe study followed guidelines from the Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA-ScR (protocol available at osf.io/zhafn). PubMed, Embase, and seven other databases were searched on November 2022, with additional monitoring until April 2023. The inclusion criteria focused on studies evaluating outcomes related to the donor area (palate) and interventions for healing or protecting it, regardless of publication year and language. Data from the included publications was extracted and presented through narrative text, tables, and figures.

resultsEighty-one studies (including 64 clinical trials, four case series, five theses, and eight systematic reviews) and 37 clinical trial records were included. The number of studies on this topic has significantly increased, reflecting a growing interest in the field. Thirty-six interventions with published results and 12 interventions with unpublished results from clinical trial registers were identified. Some promising interventions that showed potential for improving patient-reported outcomes include cyanoacrylate adhesive, platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), and the combination of palatal stents and healing agents.

conclusionsThirty-six interventions with published results were identified for postoperative use on the harvested palate, showing varying levels of evidence and conflicting effectiveness for specific outcomes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Postoperative discomfort and pain in the palate are commonly experienced by patients undergoing grafting procedures using this region as the donor area. Awareness of the available options and their levels of evidence is crucial for informed decision-making.

Indexed as

GingivaPlatelet-Rich FibrinHumansPainPalateWound HealingConnective tissue graftFree gingival graftMorbidityPalatePatient-reported outcome measuresReview

Identifiers

PMID37851129
OpenAlexW4387728846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.