Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37850938›Full record

ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2023

A controlled effects approach to assessing immune correlates of protection.

Peter B Gilbert, Youyi Fong, Avi Kenny, Marco Carone

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Neutralizing Antibody Immune Correlates for a Recombinant Protein Vaccine in the COVAIL Trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter B GilbertVaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA and Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Youyi FongVaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA and Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Avi KennyDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Marco CaroneFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, 1100 Fairview Ave N, PO Box 19024 Seattle, WA 98109, USA and University of Washington, Department of Biostatistics, Hans Rosling Center for Population Health, 3980 15th Avenue NE, Box 351617 Seattle, WA 98195-1617, USA.
University of Washington · US

Funding

SDMC: HIV Vaccine Trials NetworkUM1AI068635 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Peter B. Gilbert, Yunda Huang · 2011 to 2026
$385.9M
Statistical Methods in HIV Vaccine Efficacy TrialsR37AI054165 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Peter B. Gilbert · 2010 to 2026
$6.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI054165NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An immune correlate of risk (CoR) is an immunologic biomarker in vaccine recipients associated with an infectious disease clinical endpoint. An immune correlate of protection (CoP) is a CoR that can be used to reliably predict vaccine efficacy (VE) against the clinical endpoint and hence is accepted as a surrogate endpoint that can be used for accelerated approval or guide use of vaccines. In randomized, placebo-controlled trials, CoR analysis is limited by not assessing a causal vaccine effect. To address this limitation, we construct the controlled risk curve of a biomarker, which provides the causal risk of an endpoint if all participants are assigned vaccine and the biomarker is set to different levels. Furthermore, we propose a causal CoP analysis based on controlled effects, where for the important special case that the biomarker is constant in the placebo arm, we study the controlled vaccine efficacy curve that contrasts the controlled risk curve with placebo arm risk. We provide identification conditions and formulae that account for right censoring of the clinical endpoint and two-phase sampling of the biomarker, and consider G-computation estimation and inference under a semiparametric model such as the Cox model. We add modular approaches to sensitivity analysis that quantify robustness of CoP evidence to unmeasured confounding. We provide an application to two phase 3 trials of a dengue vaccine indicating that controlled risk of dengue strongly varies with 50$\%$ neutralizing antibody titer. Our work introduces controlled effects causal mediation analysis to immune CoP evaluation.

Indexed as

VaccinesBiomarkersHumansBiomarkersVaccinesControlled direct effectsCOVID-19 vaccineDengue vaccine efficacyE-valueImmune correlate of protectionSensitivity analysis

Identifiers

PMID37850938
PMCPMC10583729
OpenAlexW4387728326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.