ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2023
Do Not Cut Off Your Tail: A Mega-Analysis of Responses to Auditory Perturbation Experiments.
Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Auditory-Motor Mechanisms of the Lombard Effect.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026Article
- Active inference and speech motor control.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Review
- Practice Parameters That Influence Vocal Motor Adaptation in Altered Auditory Feedback Paradigms.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026Article
- The Effects of Electromagnetic Articulography Sensors on Speech in Individuals With and Without Parkinson's Disease.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026Article
- Enhanced pitch centering in individuals with laryngeal dystonia.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- An Integrated Approach to Concurrently Measure Corrective and Adaptive Responses to Auditory Errors.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025Article
- Vocal and articulatory speech control deficits in individuals with post-stroke aphasia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Adaptation response to pitch shift during speech is attenuated upon relearning.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Speech sensorimotor relationships in francophone preschoolers and adults: Adaptation to real-time auditory feedback perturbations.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe practice of removing "following" responses from speech perturbation analyses is increasingly common, despite no clear evidence as to whether these responses represent a unique response type. This study aimed to determine if the distribution of responses to auditory perturbation paradigms represents a bimodal distribution, consisting of two distinct response types, or a unimodal distribution.
methodThis mega-analysis pooled data from 22 previous studies to examine the distribution and magnitude of responses to auditory perturbations across four tasks: adaptive pitch, adaptive formant, reflexive pitch, and reflexive formant. Data included at least 150 unique participants for each task, with studies comprising younger adult, older adult, and Parkinson's disease populations. A Silverman's unimodality test followed by a smoothed bootstrap resampling technique was performed for each task to evaluate the number of modes in each distribution. Wilcoxon signed-ranks tests were also performed for each distribution to confirm significant compensation in response to the perturbation.
resultsModality analyses were not significant (
conclusionThe demonstration of a clear unimodal distribution across all tasks suggests that following responses do not represent a distinct response pattern, but rather the tail of a unimodal distribution. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.24282676.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.