Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37850785›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2023

Resilience of FEF neuronal saccade code to V4 perturbations.

Mohammad Shams, Peter Thier, Stephen G Lomber, Yaser Merrikhi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohammad ShamsHertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5081-3427
Peter ThierHertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5909-4222
Stephen G LomberDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3001-7909
Yaser MerrikhiDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9801-5427

Funding

Interaction of Visual and Oculomotor Signals in CortexR01EY014924 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MOORE, TIRIN · 2004 to 2024
$7.3M
Sensory recruitment by working memory: neuronal basis and neural circuitryR01NS113073 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI NOUDOOST, BEHRAD · 2019 to 2023
$1.8M
Understanding the neural basis for recruitment of visual areas by working memoryR01MH121435 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI NOUDOOST, BEHRAD · 2020 to 2020
$191k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014924NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH121435NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS113073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The frontal eye field (FEF) plays a key role in initiating rapid eye movements known as saccades. Accumulation models have been proposed to explain the dynamic of these neurons and how they may enable the initiation of saccades. To update the scope of the viability of this model, we studied single neurons recorded from the FEF of two rhesus monkeys while they performed a memory-guided saccade task. We evaluated the degree to which each type of FEF neuron complied with these models by quantifying how precisely their discharge predicted an imminent saccade based on their immediate presaccadic activity. We found that decoders trained on single neurons with a stronger motor component performed better than decoders trained on neurons with a stronger visual component in predicting the saccade. Importantly, despite a dramatic effect on the reaction times, the perturbations delivered to the FEF neurons via area V4 did not impact their saccade predictability. Our results demonstrate a high degree of resilience of the FEF neuronal presaccadic discharge patterns, fulfilling the predictions of accumulation models.

Indexed as

SaccadesVisual CortexFrontal LobeNeuronsReaction Timeaccumulation modelsextracellular recordingfrontal eye fieldsaccade onset decodingsaccadic eye movement

Identifiers

PMID37850785
PMCPMC10994545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.