Observational studyActa bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis2023
Radial forearm flap versus antero-lateral thigh flap in oral soft tissue reconstruction: update and statistical analysis on our 77 consecutive cases for an objective selection criteria.
Observational study in Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Our experience with super-thin anterolateral thigh flap for intraoral reconstruction.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimThe radial forearm free flap (RFFf) and the antero-lateral thigh flap (ALTf) are considered the "key flaps" for oral cavity reconstruction. Nowadays, the literature lacks of an objective and standardized decision-making algorithm for the flap choice. The aim of this study is to describe a decision-making algorithm concerning the more appropriate flap, RFFf or ALTf, in the reconstruction of intra-oral soft tissues based on the volumetric analysis of the defect with a pre-operative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), updating our previous surgical experience.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study including 77 patients who underwent microsurgical reconstruction with RFFf or ALTf after tumor resection of the soft tissues in the oral cavity. During follow-up, patients were evaluated using the UW-QOL questionnaire.
resultsAnalyzing the scores of the UW-QOL questionnaire based on the size of the tumor on preoperative MRI we found that for tumor volume <50cc and between 50-70cc, the patients reconstructed with RFFfobtained statistically significant better scores compared to the ALTf group, while for tumor volume >70cc, the patients reconstructed with ALTf reported statistically significant better scores.
conclusionsPre-operative RMI-guided volumetric assessment of oral cancer plays a key role in the planning of adequate soft tissue reconstruction and can objectively help surgeons in the correct choice of the flap (RFFf vs. ALTf) for each case based on preoperative tumor size, suggesting for defects <50cc and between 50 and 70 cc a reconstruction with RFFf, while for defects >70cc a reconstruction with ALTf.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.