Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37850726›Full record

ArticleInfancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies

Validation of an open source, remote web-based eye-tracking method (WebGazer) for research in early childhood.

Adrian Steffan, Lucie Zimmer, Natalia Arias-Trejo, Manuel Bohn, Rodrigo Dal Ben, Marco A Flores-Coronado, Laura Franchin, Isa Garbisch, Charlotte Grosse Wiesmann, J Kiley Hamlin and 23 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Automated Infant Eye Tracking: A Systematic Historical Review.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Deep learning in fetal, infant, and toddler neuroimaging research.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Attrition in a large-scale habituation task administered at home.The British journal of developmental psychology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Feasibility of Remote Visual-World Eye-Tracking With Young Children.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Conducting Developmental Research Online vs. In-Person: A Meta-Analysis.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors at 20 institutions in 11 countries.

Adrian SteffanDepartment of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany.
Lucie ZimmerDepartment of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5766-2991
Natalia Arias-TrejoFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México.
Manuel BohnDepartment of Comparative Cultural Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Rodrigo Dal BenFaculty of Arts & Science, Ambrose University, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Marco A Flores-CoronadoFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México.
Laura FranchinDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Isa GarbischDepartment of Developmental Psychology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Charlotte Grosse WiesmannResearch Group Milestones of Early Cognitive Development, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
J Kiley HamlinDepartment of Psychology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Naomi HavronSchool of Psychological Sciences & Center for the Study of Child Development, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-6429-1546
Jessica F HayDepartment of Psychology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Tone K HermansenDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Krisztina V JakobsenDepartment of Psychology, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia, USA.
Steven KalinkeDepartment of Comparative Cultural Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Eon-Suk KoDepartment of English Language and Literature, Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3963-4492
Louisa KulkeDevelopmental Psychology with Educational Psychology, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Julien MayorDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9827-5421
Marek MeristoDepartment of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6792-3123
David MoreauSchool of Psychology and Centre for Brain Research, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Seongmin MunDepartment of English Language and Literature, Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea.
Julia PreinDepartment of Comparative Cultural Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Hannes RakoczyDepartment of Developmental Psychology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Katrin RothmalerResearch Group Milestones of Early Cognitive Development, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Daniela Santos OliveiraDepartment of Psychology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Elizabeth A SimpsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2715-2533
Sylvain SiroisDepartment of Psychology, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada.
Eleanor S SmithDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Karin StridDepartment of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.
Anna-Lena TebbeResearch Group Milestones of Early Cognitive Development, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Maleen ThieleDepartment of Comparative Cultural Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1695-1850
Francis YuenDepartment of Psychology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Tobias SchuwerkDepartment of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology · DEMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences · DEChosun University · KRUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Gothenburg · SEUniversity of Göttingen · DEUniversity of Oslo · NOUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · USAmbrose University · CAHochschule Bremen · DEJames Madison University · USLeuphana University of Lüneburg · DEUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières · CAUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Haifa · ILUniversity of Miami · USUniversity of Trento · IT

Funding

Infant statistical learning: Resilience, longevity, and specificityR01HD083312 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE · PI HAY, JESSICA S · 2015 to 2019
$1.3M
Directed Language as a Useful Predictor of Speech Processing Efficiency and Vocabulary Development in Preterm InfantsR15HD099706 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE · PI NEWNAM, KATHERINE MARIE · 2019 to 2019
$452k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD083312NICHD NIH HHS R15 HD099706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring eye movements remotely via the participant's webcam promises to be an attractive methodological addition to in-person eye-tracking in the lab. However, there is a lack of systematic research comparing remote web-based eye-tracking with in-lab eye-tracking in young children. We report a multi-lab study that compared these two measures in an anticipatory looking task with toddlers using WebGazer.js and jsPsych. Results of our remotely tested sample of 18-27-month-old toddlers (N = 125) revealed that web-based eye-tracking successfully captured goal-based action predictions, although the proportion of the goal-directed anticipatory looking was lower compared to the in-lab sample (N = 70). As expected, attrition rate was substantially higher in the web-based (42%) than the in-lab sample (10%). Excluding trials based on visual inspection of the match of time-locked gaze coordinates and the participant's webcam video overlayed on the stimuli was an important preprocessing step to reduce noise in the data. We discuss the use of this remote web-based method in comparison with other current methodological innovations. Our study demonstrates that remote web-based eye-tracking can be a useful tool for testing toddlers, facilitating recruitment of larger and more diverse samples; a caveat to consider is the larger drop-out rate.

Indexed as

Eye MovementsEye-Tracking TechnologyChild, PreschoolHumansInfantInternet

Identifiers

PMID37850726
PMCPMC10841511
OpenAlexW4387728695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.