ArticleAmerican journal of hematology2024
Effect of donor age in patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation vary by conditioning intensity and recipient age.
Article in American journal of hematology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Pitfalls of Categorizing Donor Age: Arbitrary Cutoffs Fail to Predict Survival in Haploidentical HCT.American journal of hematology · 2026Article
- Donor selection for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in the posttransplant cyclophosphamide era.International journal of hematology · 2026Review
- Article
- Development and explainable AI-driven characterization of a prognostic model for haploidentical transplantation outcomes.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Challenging a clinical dogma with multimodal machine learning: a retrospective analysis of transplant mismatched donor selection.Leukemia · 2026Article
- Validated clinical risk score for acute graft-versus-host disease in adult allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Donor-recipient age difference, not donor age alone, predicts outcomes in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for aplastic anemia.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Functional analysis of the effect of isoimperatorin on human acute monocytic leukemia at the transcriptome level.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- Donor Age Matters for Haploidentical HCT Patients Even After Adjusting for HLA Factors: A Machine Learning Approach.American journal of hematology · 2025Article
- Future directions in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Hematology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024Review
- Haploidentical vs HLA-matched sibling donor HCT with PTCy prophylaxis: HLA factors and donor age considerations.Blood advances · 2024Article
- Graft-versus-tumor effect of post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We investigated the impact of donor age (younger [≤35 years] vs. older [>35 years]) after accounting for other non-HLA and HLA factors on outcomes of patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (n = 790). The effect differed by conditioning-partly related to the differences in the recipient age in myeloablative (MAC; median 46 years) versus reduced-intensity/non-myeloablative conditioning (RIC/NMA; median 61 years) groups. With MAC (n = 320), donor age had no impact on acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), but older donors were associated with a significantly higher risk of chronic GVHD (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10-2.30, p = .02) independent of recipient age and other factors. Donor age had no impact on either relapse or non-relapse mortality (NRM). The impact of donor/recipient age on overall survival changed over time. Older donors were associated with significantly higher late overall mortality (>6 months) in younger recipients (≤ 50 years; HR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.03-4.6, p = .04) but not older recipients. With RIC/NMA (n = 470), neither recipient's nor donor's age influenced the risk of GVHD. Donor age had no significant impact on the risk of relapse, but older donors were associated with a significantly higher risk of NRM (HR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.02-2.6, p = .04) independent of recipient age. Older donor age was associated with significantly higher late overall mortality (>9 months) in older recipients (>50 years; HR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.0-2.67; p = .049) but not in younger recipients. Donor selection based on donor age may require a tailored approach for a particular recipient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.