Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37850668›Full record

ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2023

Do adult Magicicada (Hemiptera: Cicadidae) feed? Historical perspectives and evidence from molecular gut content analysis.

James R Hepler, W Rodney Cooper, John P Cullum, Chris Dardick, Liam Dardick, Laura J Nixon, Derek J Pouchnik, Michael J Raupp, Paula Shrewsbury, Tracy C Leskey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. First Record ofInsects · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

James R HeplerUSDA Agricultural Research Service, Appalachian Fruit Research Station, 2217 Wiltshire Road, Kearneysville, WV 25430, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3196-0720
W Rodney CooperTemperate Tree Fruit and Vegetable Research Unit, USDA Agricultural Research Service, 5230 Konnowac Pass Road, Wapato, WA 98951, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7983-3627
John P CullumUSDA Agricultural Research Service, Appalachian Fruit Research Station, 2217 Wiltshire Road, Kearneysville, WV 25430, USA.
Chris DardickUSDA Agricultural Research Service, Appalachian Fruit Research Station, 2217 Wiltshire Road, Kearneysville, WV 25430, USA.
Liam DardickUSDA Agricultural Research Service, Appalachian Fruit Research Station, 2217 Wiltshire Road, Kearneysville, WV 25430, USA.
Laura J NixonUSDA Agricultural Research Service, Appalachian Fruit Research Station, 2217 Wiltshire Road, Kearneysville, WV 25430, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4541-3920
Derek J PouchnikLaboratory for Biotechnology and Bioanalysis, Washington State University, 227 Biotechnology/Life Sciences Building, Pullman, WA 99164, USA.
Michael J RauppEntomology Department, University of Maryland, Plant Sciences Building, 4291 Fieldhouse Drive, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Paula ShrewsburyEntomology Department, University of Maryland, Plant Sciences Building, 4291 Fieldhouse Drive, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Tracy C LeskeyUSDA Agricultural Research Service, Appalachian Fruit Research Station, 2217 Wiltshire Road, Kearneysville, WV 25430, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6299-4384
Agricultural Research Service · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · USWashington State University · US

Funding

USDA-ARS-CRIS 8080-21000-032-000D
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The periodical cicadas in the genus Magicicada are remarkable for their unusual life histories and dramatic synchronized emergences every 13 or 17 years. While aspects of their evolution, mating behaviors, and general biology have been well-characterized, there is surprising uncertainty surrounding the feeding habits of the short-lived adult stage. Despite a tentative scientific consensus to the contrary, the perception that adult Magicicada do not feed has persisted among the general public, and recent studies are lacking. We directly investigated the feeding behavior of Magicicada spp. through high-throughput sequencing (HTS)-based dietary analysis of nymphs, freshly molted (teneral) adults, and fully sclerotized adults collected from orchard and wooded habitats during the 2021 emergence of Brood X. Identifiable plant DNA (trnF, ITS amplicons) was successfully recovered from nymphs and adults. No plant DNA was recovered from teneral adults, suggesting that all DNA recovered from sclerotized adults was ingested during the post-teneral adult stage. Both nymphs and adults were found to have ingested a range of woody and herbaceous plants across 17 genera and 14 families. Significantly more plant genera per individual were recovered from adults than from nymphs, likely reflecting the greater mobility of the adult stage. We hypothesize that the demonstrated ingestion of plant sap by Magicicada adults is driven by a need to replace lost water and support specialized bacteriome-dwelling endosymbionts that cicadas depend upon for growth and development, which constitutes true feeding behavior.

Indexed as

HemipteraAnimalsEcosystemFeeding BehaviorHumansNymphReproductiongut content analysismetabarcodingperiodical cicadaxylem feeding

Identifiers

PMID37850668
PMCPMC10583540
OpenAlexW4387729276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.