Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37850534›Full record

ArticleJournal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community2025

Feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of a mental health drop-in centre for the siblings of young people attending a paediatric hospital.

Sophie D Bennett, Natalia Rojas, Matteo Catanzano, Anna Roach, Brian Cf Ching, Anna E Coughtrey, Isobel Heyman, Holan Liang, Lucy Project Team, Roz Shafran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sophie D BennettUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Natalia RojasUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6615-9618
Matteo CatanzanoUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7876-4348
Anna RoachUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0635-0429
Brian Cf ChingUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Anna E CoughtreyUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Isobel HeymanUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Holan LiangUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Lucy Project TeamUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Roz ShafranUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Siblings of children with long-term conditions (LTCs) can have significantly elevated mental health needs, but these are often overlooked. A pragmatic single-arm feasibility pilot assessed feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of a drop-in centre in a paediatric hospital addressing mental health needs of patients with LTCs, their carers and siblings. The drop-in centre accepted self-referral and supplemented existing provision offering a suite of interventions, including signposting, diagnostic assessments and/or guided self-help. This paper reports on feasibility, acceptability and preliminary outcomes of this centre for siblings. Eighteen siblings aged 2-17 used the centre. Sixteen of their parents completed the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaires at baseline and 6 months post-baseline, and ten completed parent-reported PedsQL across two time points. Preliminary effectiveness results demonstrated a decrease in mental health symptoms with large effect size (score reduction of 3.44, 95% CI [1.25, 5.63], d = 0.84) and small effect on quality of life, with scores increasing from a median of 69.91, 95% CI [53.57, 91.67], to a median of 80.44, 95% CI [67.39, 89.13], r = 0.11 for these siblings. 88% of parents were satisfied with this provision for their sibling child. This study highlights the feasibility and value of assessing siblings for emotional and behavioural difficulties and providing them with an accessible, effective and acceptable intervention.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental Health ServicesSiblingsAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFeasibility StudiesFemaleHospitals, PediatricHumansMaleMental HealthParentsPilot ProjectsQuality of LifeSurveys and Questionnaireschronic diseasemental healthpediatricsquality of lifeSiblings

Identifiers

PMID37850534
PMCPMC12145473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.