ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2023
Adherent Abdominal Scar Revision Does Not Require Total Scar Removal.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abdominal surgery can cause notable scars that adhere to the abdominal tissues below. Full scar removal is generally not recommended due to the risk of intestinal damage and delayed wound healing. Here, we describe a surgical scar-revision procedure for adherent abdominal scars that does not involve either opening the abdominal cavity or total scar removal. A 58-year-old woman exhibited an aesthetically displeasing hypertrophic adherent abdominal scar that extended from the umbilical fold to the pubic area and distorted the umbilicus. It arose from multiple laparotomies for hernia repair and subsequent complications. Pain/discomfort and functional impairment were absent. Scar-revision surgery was conducted under general anesthesia. The skin around the adherent scar was excised down to the subcutaneous layer with a minimal margin. However, only the epidermis and superficial dermal layer of the adherent scar were removed; the deep scar dermis remained. The skin flaps on either side of the midline were then advanced and sutured over the remnant dermis. One year after surgery, the aesthetic and functional outcomes were excellent. Furthermore, no hypertrophic scars or epidermal cysts were found. This technique is effective, efficient, does not involve intraabdominal procedures, provides a vascularized tissue layer, and results in an aesthetically pleasing scar.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.