Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37850205›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2023

Determination of Appropriate Umbilicus Position during Abdominoplasty in Male Patients.

Bishara S Atiyeh, Saif E Emsieh, Amir E Ibrahim, Romeu R Fadul, Christopher R A Hakim, Anika G Gnaedinger, Ahmad K Oneisi, Rawad S Chalhoub, Paul T Beaineh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Surgical Correction of Low-positioned Umbilicus after Mini-abdominoplasty.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Bishara S AtiyehFrom the American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Saif E EmsiehFrom the American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Amir E IbrahimFrom the American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Romeu R FadulSirio Libanes Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil.
Christopher R A HakimFrom the American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Anika G GnaedingerDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, N.C.
Ahmad K OneisiDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, N.C.
Rawad S ChalhoubDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, N.C.
Paul T BeainehFrom the American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
American University of Beirut Medical Center · LBDuke University · USHospital São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Abdominoplasty techniques are well documented. The ideal position of the umbilicus has, however, received limited attention. Unfortunately, umbilicus position is not universally agreed upon in male cosmetic abdominoplasty. This study was conducted to determine the ideal umbilicus anthropometric measurements in young men, and the relationships between umbilical position and anterior trunk and torso reference points that may be applicable to intraoperative positioning. It is aimed also at investigating whether umbilicus position would be more accurately determined by considering nipple position instead of the abdominal crease, as recently proposed. Methods: Several anthropometric measurements of various anterior abdominal and thoracic landmarks were conducted on 60 young and middle-aged male volunteers and 30 cadavers at São Paulo city. All statistical analysis was completed using Stata software. Results: Of all the measured reference points, a much stronger correlation (0.513) was demonstrated between umbilicus-anterior axillary fold (U-AX) and inter-nipple (N-N) distances with a constant golden number ratio relationship (N-N = U-AX × 0.618) compared with the weak correlation of 0.034 between umbilicus-xiphisternum and umbilicus-abdominal crease. In 75% of volunteers, the calculated U-AX was within ±3 cm of actual measurement, and in 33.33% within ±1 cm. Conclusions: U-AX = 1.618 × N-N equation is more predictive of adequate umbilicus repositioning during abdominoplasty in male patients. Chest and abdomen of men are a single aesthetic unit. Proper positioning of the nipples and umbilicus, as well as harmonious abdominal and torso proportions are critical for an optimal final aesthetic outcome.

Identifiers

PMID37850205
PMCPMC10578692
OpenAlexW4387676098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.