Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37850203›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2023

Prophylactic Absorbable Antibiotic Beads for High-risk, Implant-based Prepectoral Reconstruction.

Shahnur Ahmed, Jason T C Lee, Dylan Roth, Mithun Sinha, Carla Fisher, Betty Fan, Folasade Imeokparia, Kandice Ludwig, Mary E Lester, Aladdin H Hassanein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shahnur AhmedFrom Division of Plastic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind.
Jason T C LeeFrom Division of Plastic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind.
Dylan RothFrom Division of Plastic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind.
Mithun SinhaFrom Division of Plastic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind.
Carla FisherFrom Division of Plastic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind.
Betty FanFrom Division of Plastic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind.
Folasade ImeokpariaFrom Division of Plastic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind.
Kandice LudwigFrom Division of Plastic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind.
Mary E LesterFrom Division of Plastic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind.
Aladdin H HassaneinFrom Division of Plastic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infections are problematic in postmastectomy implant-based reconstruction with infection rates as high as 30%. Strategies to reduce the risk of infection have demonstrated various efficacies. A prolonged course of systemic, oral antibiotics has not shown evidence-based benefit. Although absorbable antibiotic beads have been described for orthopedic procedures and pressure wounds, their use has not been well studied during breast reconstruction, particularly for prepectoral implant placement. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the selective use of prophylactic absorbable calcium sulfate antibiotic beads during high-risk implant-based, prepectoral breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Patients who underwent implant-based, prepectoral breast reconstruction between 2019 and 2022 were reviewed. Groups were divided into those who received antibiotic beads and those who did not. Outcome variables included postoperative infection at 90 days. A total of 148 patients (256 implants) were included: 15 patients (31 implants) who received biodegradable antibiotic beads and 133 patients (225 implants) in the control group. Patients who received antibiotic beads were more likely to have a history of infection (66.7%) compared with the control group (0%) (

Identifiers

PMID37850203
PMCPMC10578659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.