Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37850170›Full record

ArticleBME frontiers2022

Label-Free Virtual HER2 Immunohistochemical Staining of Breast Tissue using Deep Learning.

Bijie Bai, Hongda Wang, Yuzhu Li, Kevin de Haan, Francesco Colonnese, Yujie Wan, Jingyi Zuo, Ngan B Doan, Xiaoran Zhang, Yijie Zhang and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BME frontiers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Machine learning methods for histopathological image analysis: Updates in 2024.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Bijie BaiElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4744-996X
Hongda WangElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Yuzhu LiElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Kevin de HaanElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Francesco ColonneseComputer Science Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Yujie WanPhysics and Astronomy Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Jingyi ZuoComputer Science Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ngan B DoanTranslational Pathology Core Laboratory, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Xiaoran ZhangElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Yijie ZhangElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7774-4372
Jingxi LiElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Xilin YangElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Wenjie DongStatistics Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Morgan Angus DarrowDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California at Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
Elham KamangarDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California at Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
Han Sung LeeDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California at Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
Yair RivensonElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Aydogan OzcanElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0717-683X

Funding

UCLA Clinical Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001881 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARLEEN F. BROWN, ARASH NAEIM · 2016 to 2026
$118.1M
TRD3: Data Analytics and Intelligent Systems (AI-ML-DL-Visualization)P41EB032840 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Griffith R. Harsh · 2022 to 2026
$6.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001881NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB032840
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) biomarker is widely practiced in breast tissue analysis, preclinical studies, and diagnostic decisions, guiding cancer treatment and investigation of pathogenesis. HER2 staining demands laborious tissue treatment and chemical processing performed by a histotechnologist, which typically takes one day to prepare in a laboratory, increasing analysis time and associated costs. Here, we describe a deep learning-based virtual HER2 IHC staining method using a conditional generative adversarial network that is trained to rapidly transform autofluorescence microscopic images of unlabeled/label-free breast tissue sections into bright-field equivalent microscopic images, matching the standard HER2 IHC staining that is chemically performed on the same tissue sections. The efficacy of this virtual HER2 staining framework was demonstrated by quantitative analysis, in which three board-certified breast pathologists blindly graded the HER2 scores of virtually stained and immunohistochemically stained HER2 whole slide images (WSIs) to reveal that the HER2 scores determined by inspecting virtual IHC images are as accurate as their immunohistochemically stained counterparts. A second quantitative blinded study performed by the same diagnosticians further revealed that the virtually stained HER2 images exhibit a comparable staining quality in the level of nuclear detail, membrane clearness, and absence of staining artifacts with respect to their immunohistochemically stained counterparts. This virtual HER2 staining framework bypasses the costly, laborious, and time-consuming IHC staining procedures in laboratory and can be extended to other types of biomarkers to accelerate the IHC tissue staining used in life sciences and biomedical workflow.

Identifiers

PMID37850170
PMCPMC10521710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.