Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37850043›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular digital health journal2023

Validity and reliability of seismocardiography for the estimation of cardiorespiratory fitness.

Mikkel T Hansen, Tue Rømer, Amalie Højgaard, Karina Husted, Kasper Sørensen, Samuel E Schmidt, Flemming Dela, Jørn W Helge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular digital health journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Nonexercise Estimation of V̇OEuropean journal of sport science · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. VOCurrent cardiology reports · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. V̇OInternational journal of obesity (2005) · 2025
    Article
  10. Estimating V̇OFrontiers in sports and active living · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mikkel T HansenXlab, Center for Healthy Aging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tue RømerXlab, Center for Healthy Aging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Amalie HøjgaardXlab, Center for Healthy Aging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Karina HustedXlab, Center for Healthy Aging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kasper SørensenDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Samuel E SchmidtDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Flemming DelaXlab, Center for Healthy Aging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jørn W HelgeXlab, Center for Healthy Aging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKAalborg University · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Low cardiorespiratory fitness (ie, peak oxygen consumption [ Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of Seismofit Methods: On 3 separate days, 20 participants (10 women) underwent estimations of Results: Seismofit Conclusion: The Seismofit is highly reliable in its estimation of

Indexed as

Cardiorespiratory fitness testMethod agreementNonexercise VO2peak equationSeismocardiographyVO2max estimation

Identifiers

PMID37850043
PMCPMC10577491
OpenAlexW4386617010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.