Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37850041›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2023

Evaluation of the validated intraoperative bleeding scale in liver surgery: study protocol for a multicenter prospective study.

Daniel Aparicio-López, José Manuel Asencio-Pascual, Gerardo Blanco-Fernández, Esteban Cugat-Andorrá, Miguel Ángel Gómez-Bravo, Santiago López-Ben, Elena Martín-Pérez, Luis Sabater, José Manuel Ramia, Mario Serradilla-Martín

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05369988 (VALIDATION OF THE VIBe INTRAOPERATIVE BLEEDING SCALE IN LIVER SURGERY. PROSPECTIVE AND MULTICENTRIC STUDY), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05369988 unknown statusnot on this map

VALIDATION OF THE VIBe INTRAOPERATIVE BLEEDING SCALE IN LIVER SURGERY. PROSPECTIVE AND MULTICENTRIC STUDY

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorHospital Miguel ServetRan2022 to 2023Enrolled259ConditionsSurgical Hemorrhage, Liver Cancer, Liver Metastases
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel Aparicio-LópezDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain.
José Manuel Asencio-PascualDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Gerardo Blanco-FernándezDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Badajoz, Badajoz, Spain.
Esteban Cugat-AndorráDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Mutua de Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain.
Miguel Ángel Gómez-BravoDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain.
Santiago López-BenDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Dr. Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain.
Elena Martín-PérezDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
Luis SabaterDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Clínico Universitario, INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain.
José Manuel RamiaDepartment of Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, ISABIAL, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain.
Mario Serradilla-MartínDepartment of Surgery, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet · ESCentro de Implantología Cirugía Oral y Maxilofacial · ESHospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia · ESHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESHospital Universitari de Girona Doctor Josep Trueta · ESHospital Universitario de La Princesa · ESHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío · ESUniversitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx · ESUniversity Hospital Mútua de Terrassa · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Surgical hemostasis has become one of the key principles in the advancement of surgery. Hemostatic agents are commonly administered in many surgical specialties, although the lack of consensus on the definition of intraoperative bleeding or of a standardized system for its classification means that often the most suitable agent is not selected. The recommendations of international organizations highlight the need for a bleeding severity scale, validated in clinical studies, that would allow the selection of the best hemostatic agent in each case. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the VIBe scale (Validated Intraoperative Bleeding Scale) in humans. Secondary objectives are to evaluate the scale's usefulness in liver surgery; to determine the relationship between the extent of bleeding and the hemostatic agent used; and to assess the relationship between the grade of bleeding and postoperative complications. Methods: Prospective multicenter observational study including 259 liver resections that meet the inclusion criteria: patients scheduled for liver surgery at one of 10 medium-high volume Spanish HPB centers using an open or minimally invasive approach (robotic/laparoscopic/hybrid), regardless of diagnosis, ASA score <4, age ≥18, and who provide signed informed consent during the study period (September 2023 until the required sample size has been recruited). The participating researchers will be responsible for collecting the data and for reporting them to the study coordinators. Discussion: This study will allow us to evaluate the VIBe scale for intraoperative bleeding in humans, with a view to its subsequent incorporation in daily clinical practice. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05369988?term = serradilla&draw = 2&rank = 3, [NCT0536998].

Indexed as

hemostatic agentintraoperative bleedingliver surgerypredictive scoresurgical hemostasis

Identifiers

PMID37850041
PMCPMC10577188
OpenAlexW4387267405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.