Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37850036›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2023

GraphPart: homology partitioning for biological sequence analysis.

Felix Teufel, Magnús Halldór Gíslason, José Juan Almagro Armenteros, Alexander Rosenberg Johansen, Ole Winther, Henrik Nielsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. SignalP: The Evolution of a Web Server.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Felix TeufelDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1275-8065
Magnús Halldór GíslasonDepartment of Genomic Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital/Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
José Juan Almagro ArmenterosDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Alexander Rosenberg JohansenDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University School of Engineering, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Ole WintherDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Henrik NielsenDepartment of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9412-9643

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When splitting biological sequence data for the development and testing of predictive models, it is necessary to avoid too-closely related pairs of sequences ending up in different partitions. If this is ignored, performance of prediction methods will tend to be overestimated. Several algorithms have been proposed for homology reduction, where sequences are removed until no too-closely related pairs remain. We present GraphPart, an algorithm for homology partitioning that divides the data such that closely related sequences always end up in the same partition, while keeping as many sequences as possible in the dataset. Evaluation of GraphPart on Protein, DNA and RNA datasets shows that it is capable of retaining a larger number of sequences per dataset, while providing homology separation on a par with reduction approaches.

Identifiers

PMID37850036
PMCPMC10578201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.