ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2023
Exploring the Support and Involvement of Family Caregivers for Reablement Programs: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring perspectives of older adults and informal caregivers on physical activity during non-weight-bearing rehabilitation: a qualitative study.European geriatric medicine · 2026Article
- Living well with dementia: a qualitative interview study on family caregivers' call for more person- and family-centered dementia support.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- The burden of informal family caregiving in Europe, 2000-2050: a microsimulation modelling study.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Reablement is a person-centered, holistic approach promoting older adults' participation through social, leisure, and physical activities. Family caregivers are seldom involved in reablement services despite their wish to be an active member of the care team and expressing a need for more support and recognition. The voice of family caregivers is often forgotten when evaluating services such as reablement. Little is known how family caregivers can be involved and supported more effectively in reablement services, therefore the aim of our research is to investigate the perceived support and involvement of family caregivers. Methods: As part of the TRANS-SENIOR project, we studied perceived support and involvement of family caregivers during and after geriatric rehabilitation, a setting in which principles of reablement, like goal setting and training of daily activities, are applied. In total, fourteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with family caregivers of people admitted to a geriatric rehabilitation facility. Thematic analysis was used. Results: Results reflected four themes: (1) support for family caregivers, (2) involvement in care, (3) trusting care professionals, and (4) asking for and accepting support. Family caregivers' experiences with support from care professionals were mainly ambivalent. While caregivers expressing a lack of support and information whilst also indicating that they do not expect to be supported by care professionals. Regarding involvement, caregivers wanted to be involved; ie express their opinion and be involved in decision-making. However, more involvement could also lead to a higher burden. Conclusion: There is a discrepancy between the perceived support and involvement of family caregivers, their expressed needs, and their expectations of care professionals. A personalized approach is needed to create room for the family caregiver to be an active participant in the care process while also providing the right amount of support, when preferred by the caregiver.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.