Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37849948›Full record

ArticleBiodesign research2021

Durable CRISPR-Based Epigenetic Silencing.

Muneaki Nakamura, Alexis E Ivec, Yuchen Gao, Lei S Qi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biodesign research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Silencing of humanJournal of Huntington's disease · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Epigenome editing based treatment: Progresses and challenges.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Advances in CRISPR therapeutics.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Muneaki NakamuraDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford, CA 94305USA.
Alexis E IvecDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford, CA 94305USA.
Yuchen GaoDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford, CA 94305USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7643-7514
Lei S QiDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford, CA 94305USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3965-3223

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development of CRISPR-based epigenome editing tools is important for the study and engineering of biological behavior. Here, we describe the design of a reporter system for quantifying the ability of CRISPR epigenome editors to produce a stable gene repression. We characterize the dynamics of durable gene silencing and reactivation, as well as the induced epigenetic changes of this system. We report the creation of single-protein CRISPR constructs bearing combinations of three epigenetic editing domains, termed KAL, that can stably repress the gene expression. This system should allow for the development of novel epigenome editing tools which will be useful in a wide array of biological research and engineering applications.

Identifiers

PMID37849948
PMCPMC10521745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.