Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37849946›Full record

ArticleBiodesign research2021

In-Depth Computational Analysis of Natural and Artificial Carbon Fixation Pathways.

Hannes Löwe, Andreas Kremling

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biodesign research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Systematic design and evaluation of artificial COSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  3. Synthetic CmBio · 2025
    Article
  4. Mixotrophy for carbon-conserving waste upcycling.PLoS computational biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. New-to-nature CONature communications · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Photosynthesis 2.0: Realizing New-to-Nature COCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  14. Enzymatic Conversion of COChemical reviews · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hannes LöweSystems Biotechnology, Technical University of Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3867-6391
Andreas KremlingSystems Biotechnology, Technical University of Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the recent years, engineering new-to-nature CO

Identifiers

PMID37849946
PMCPMC10521678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.