ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023
A New Deep Learning-based Dynamic Paradigm Towards Open-World Plant Disease Detection.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-Driven detection and decision support system for precision management of maize downy mildew.PloS one · 2026Article
- Comprehensive plant health monitoring: expert-level assessment with spatio-temporal image data.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Enhancing anomaly detection in plant disease recognition with knowledge ensemble.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Plant disease recognition datasets in the age of deep learning: challenges and opportunities.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- An iterative noisy annotation correction model for robust plant disease detection.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant disease detection has made significant strides thanks to the emergence of deep learning. However, existing methods have been limited to closed-set and static learning settings, where models are trained using a specific dataset. This confinement restricts the model's adaptability when encountering samples from unseen disease categories. Additionally, there is a challenge of knowledge degradation for these static learning settings, as the acquisition of new knowledge tends to overwrite the old when learning new categories. To overcome these limitations, this study introduces a novel paradigm for plant disease detection called open-world setting. Our approach can infer disease categories that have never been seen during the model training phase and gradually learn these unseen diseases through dynamic knowledge updates in the next training phase. Specifically, we utilize a well-trained unknown-aware region proposal network to generate pseudo-labels for unknown diseases during training and employ a class-agnostic classifier to enhance the recall rate for unknown diseases. Besides, we employ a sample replay strategy to maintain recognition ability for previously learned classes. Extensive experimental evaluation and ablation studies investigate the efficacy of our method in detecting old and unknown classes. Remarkably, our method demonstrates robust generalization ability even in cross-species disease detection experiments. Overall, this open-world and dynamically updated detection method shows promising potential to become the future paradigm for plant disease detection. We discuss open issues including classification and localization, and propose promising approaches to address them. We encourage further research in the community to tackle the crucial challenges in open-world plant disease detection. The code will be released at https://github.com/JiuqingDong/OWPDD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.