ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023
Optimization of cabbage (
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- PVP-40 mediated enhancement of mesophyll protoplast yield and viability for transient gene expression in black huckleberry.Plant methods · 2025Article
- Review
- Applications of CRISPR/Cas tools in improving stress tolerance inFrontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Applications and Prospects of CRISPR/Cas9 Technology in the Breeding of Major Tropical Crops.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Isolation of Haustorium Protoplasts Optimized by Orthogonal Design for Transient Gene Expression inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Advances in and Perspectives on Transgenic Technology and CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Editing in Broccoli.Genes · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome editing techniques, such as Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats/CRISPR-associated systems (CRISPR/Cas9) are undoubtedly becoming an indispensable tool for improving food crops and tackling agricultural challenges. In the present study, key factors affecting transformation efficiency, such as PEG4000 concentration, incubation time, and plasmid amount were evaluated to achieve efficient delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 vector into cabbage protoplasts. Using amplicon sequencing, we confirmed a significant effect of PEG4000 concentration and incubation time on the induced target mutations. By optimizing the transformation protocol, editing efficiency of 26.4% was achieved with 40 µg of plasmid and 15 minutes incubation with 50% PEG4000. While these factors strongly affected the mutation rate, the viability of the transformed protoplasts remained high. Our findings would be useful for successful genome editing in cabbage and other brassicas, as well as in research areas such as gene function analysis and subcellular localization that rely on transient transformation methods in protoplasts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.