Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37849826›Full record

SynthesisPeerJ2023

Prognostic value of serum phosphate levels in sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shengfeng Wei, Yunhan Li, Chunhua Zhang, Xiangjian Guo, Xinmeng Liang, Yanmei Huang, Fan Zhang, Jihong Li, Qiangqiang Liu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shengfeng Wei *Department of Emergency Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yunhan Li *Department of Emergency Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Chunhua ZhangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiangjian GuoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Xinmeng LiangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yanmei HuangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Fan ZhangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jihong LiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Qiangqiang LiuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNThe First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There remain controversies over the conclusion of different serum phosphate levels as prognostic predictors of sepsis patients. As such, this study investigated the association between different serum phosphate and the prognosis of sepsis. Methods: Data from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically retrieved from the inception of databases to June 1, 2023 and independently screened and extracted by two authors. Binary variables in the study were estimated as relative risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI), and continuous variables were estimated as mean and standard deviation. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was employed to evaluate the quality of the included studies, and subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed for all outcomes to explore the sources of heterogeneity. Results: Ten studies were included in this study including 38,320 patients with sepsis or septic shock. Against normal serum phosphate levels, a high serum phosphate level was associated with an elevated all-cause mortality risk (RR = 1.46; 95% CI [1.22-1.74]; Conclusion: Sepsis patients with high serum phosphate levels before therapeutic interventions were associated with a significant increase in the all-cause mortality risk, prolonged ICU LOS, and no significant difference in in-hospital LOS. Sepsis patients with low serum phosphate levels before interventions may have a reduced risk of all-cause mortality, shorter ICU LOS, and in-hospital LOS, but the results were not statistically significant.

Indexed as

SepsisShock, SepticHumansIntensive Care UnitsPhosphatesPrognosisPhosphatesHyperphosphatemiaHypophosphatemiaMeta-analysisPhosphateReviewSepsis

Identifiers

PMID37849826
PMCPMC10578301
OpenAlexW4387602646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.