Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37849787›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal open2023

Instantaneous detection of acute myocardial infarction and ischaemia from a single carotid pressure waveform in rats.

Rashid Alavi, Wangde Dai, Ray V Matthews, Robert A Kloner, Niema M Pahlevan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Assessment of Myocardial Injury Size Metrics Using Carotid Pressure Waveform: Proof-of-Concept in Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Rat Model.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rashid AlaviDepartment of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Southern California, 3650 McClintock Ave. Room 400, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1179-7089
Wangde DaiDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1975 Zonal Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Ray V MatthewsDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1975 Zonal Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Robert A KlonerDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1975 Zonal Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Niema M PahlevanDepartment of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Southern California, 3650 McClintock Ave. Room 400, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7498-0396
University of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Myocardial infarction (MI) is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. It is well accepted that early diagnosis followed by early reperfusion therapy significantly increases the MI survival. Diagnosis of acute MI is traditionally based on the presence of chest pain and electrocardiogram (ECG) criteria. However, around 50% of the MIs are without chest pain, and ECG is neither completely specific nor definitive. Therefore, there is an unmet need for methods that allow detection of acute MI or ischaemia without using ECG. Our hypothesis is that a hybrid physics-based machine learning (ML) method can detect the occurrence of acute MI or ischaemia from a single carotid pressure waveform. Methods and results: We used a standard occlusion/reperfusion rat model. Physics-based ML classifiers were developed using intrinsic frequency parameters extracted from carotid pressure waveforms. ML models were trained, validated, and generalized using data from 32 rats. The final ML models were tested on an external stratified blind dataset from additional 13 rats. When tested on blind data, the best ML model showed specificity = 0.92 and sensitivity = 0.92 for detecting acute MI. The best model's specificity and sensitivity for ischaemia detection were 0.85 and 0.92, respectively. Conclusion: We demonstrated that a hybrid physics-based ML approach can detect the occurrence of acute MI and ischaemia from carotid pressure waveform in rats. Since carotid pressure waveforms can be measured non-invasively, this proof-of-concept pre-clinical study can potentially be expanded in future studies for non-invasive detection of MI or myocardial ischaemia.

Indexed as

Acute myocardial infarction/ischaemiaArterial waveformCardiovascular intrinsic frequencyDiagnosisMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID37849787
PMCPMC10578505
OpenAlexW4387298436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.