Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37849755›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2023

Complement-activating donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies in solid organ transplantation: systematic review, meta-analysis, and critical appraisal.

Solaf Al-Awadhi, Marc Raynaud, Kevin Louis, Antoine Bouquegneau, Jean-Luc Taupin, Olivier Aubert, Alexandre Loupy, Carmen Lefaucheur

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Human leukocyte antigen-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation after desensitization: experience from a major transplant centre in Mexico.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Solaf Al-AwadhiUniversité de Paris Cité, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR)-S970, Paris Cardiovascular Research Center (PARCC), Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, Paris, France.
Marc RaynaudUniversité de Paris Cité, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR)-S970, Paris Cardiovascular Research Center (PARCC), Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, Paris, France.
Kevin LouisUniversité de Paris Cité, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR)-S970, Paris Cardiovascular Research Center (PARCC), Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, Paris, France.
Antoine BouquegneauUniversité de Paris Cité, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR)-S970, Paris Cardiovascular Research Center (PARCC), Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, Paris, France.
Jean-Luc TaupinDepartment of Immunology and Histocompatibility, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Paris-GH St-Louis Lariboisière, Paris, France.
Olivier AubertUniversité de Paris Cité, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR)-S970, Paris Cardiovascular Research Center (PARCC), Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, Paris, France.
Alexandre LoupyUniversité de Paris Cité, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR)-S970, Paris Cardiovascular Research Center (PARCC), Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, Paris, France.
Carmen LefaucheurUniversité de Paris Cité, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR)-S970, Paris Cardiovascular Research Center (PARCC), Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, Paris, France.
Paris Cardiovascular Research Center · FRHôpital Lariboisière · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Several studies have investigated the impact of circulating complement-activating anti-human leukocyte antigen donor-specific antibodies (anti-HLA DSAs) on organ transplant outcomes. However, a critical appraisal of these studies and a demonstration of the prognostic value of complement-activating status over anti-HLA DSA mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) level are lacking. Methods: We conducted a systematic review, meta-analysis and critical appraisal evaluating the role of complement-activating anti-HLA DSAs on allograft outcomes in different solid organ transplants. We included studies through Medline, Cochrane, Scopus, and Embase since inception of databases till May 05, 2023. We evaluated allograft loss as the primary outcome, and allograft rejection as the secondary outcome. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and funnel plots to assess risk of bias and used bias adjustment methods when appropriate. We performed multiple subgroup analyses to account for sources of heterogeneity and studied the added value of complement assays over anti-HLA DSA MFI level. Results: In total, 52 studies were included in the final meta-analysis (11,035 patients). Complement-activating anti-HLA DSAs were associated with an increased risk of allograft loss (HR 2.77; 95% CI 2.33-3.29, p<0.001; I²=46.2%), and allograft rejection (HR 4.98; 95% CI 2.96-8.36, p<0.01; I²=70.9%). These results remained significant after adjustment for potential sources of bias and across multiple subgroup analyses. After adjusting on pan-IgG anti-HLA DSA defined by the MFI levels, complement-activating anti-HLA DSAs were significantly and independently associated with an increased risk of allograft loss. Discussion: We demonstrated in this systematic review, meta-analysis and critical appraisal the significant deleterious impact and the independent prognostic value of circulating complement-activating anti-HLA DSAs on solid organ transplant risk of allograft loss and rejection.

Indexed as

Graft RejectionOrgan TransplantationComplement System ProteinsHLA AntigensHumansTransplantation, HomologousComplement System ProteinsHLA Antigensanti-HLAcomplement-activationdonor specific antibodiesrejectiontransplantation outcomes

Identifiers

PMID37849755
PMCPMC10577173
OpenAlexW4387252637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.