Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37849643›Full record

ArticleResearch (Washington, D.C.)2023

Generic Interpretable Reaction Condition Predictions with Open Reaction Condition Datasets and Unsupervised Learning of Reaction Center.

Xiaorui Wang, Chang-Yu Hsieh, Xiaodan Yin, Jike Wang, Yuquan Li, Yafeng Deng, Dejun Jiang, Zhenxing Wu, Hongyan Du, Hongming Chen and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research (Washington, D.C.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. ASKCOS: Open-Source, Data-Driven Synthesis Planning.Accounts of chemical research · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Xiaorui WangDr. Neher's Biophysics Laboratory for Innovative Drug Discovery, State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Macau Institute for Applied Research in Medicine and Health, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macao, 999078, China.
Chang-Yu HsiehInnovation Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine of Zhejiang University, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Xiaodan YinDr. Neher's Biophysics Laboratory for Innovative Drug Discovery, State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Macau Institute for Applied Research in Medicine and Health, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macao, 999078, China.
Jike WangInnovation Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine of Zhejiang University, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Yuquan LiCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Yafeng DengCarbonSilicon AI Technology Co., Ltd, Hangzhou, Zhejiang310018, China.
Dejun JiangInnovation Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine of Zhejiang University, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Zhenxing WuInnovation Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine of Zhejiang University, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Hongyan DuInnovation Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine of Zhejiang University, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Hongming ChenCenter of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory, Guangzhou 510530, China.
Yun LiCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Huanxiang LiuFaculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao, 999078, China.
Yuwei WangCollege of Pharmacy, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, Shaanxi, 712044, China.
Pei LuoDr. Neher's Biophysics Laboratory for Innovative Drug Discovery, State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Macau Institute for Applied Research in Medicine and Health, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macao, 999078, China.
Tingjun HouInnovation Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine of Zhejiang University, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Xiaojun YaoFaculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao, 999078, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8974-0173
Zhejiang Lab · CNMacau University of Science and Technology · MOLanzhou City University · CNMacao Polytechnic University · MOGuangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory · CNNano Carbon (Poland) · PLShaanxi University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective synthesis planning powered by deep learning (DL) can significantly accelerate the discovery of new drugs and materials. However, most DL-assisted synthesis planning methods offer either none or very limited capability to recommend suitable reaction conditions (RCs) for their reaction predictions. Currently, the prediction of RCs with a DL framework is hindered by several factors, including: (a) lack of a standardized dataset for benchmarking, (b) lack of a general prediction model with powerful representation, and (c) lack of interpretability. To address these issues, we first created 2 standardized RC datasets covering a broad range of reaction classes and then proposed a powerful and interpretable Transformer-based RC predictor named Parrot. Through careful design of the model architecture, pretraining method, and training strategy, Parrot improved the overall top-3 prediction accuracy on catalysis, solvents, and other reagents by as much as 13.44%, compared to the best previous model on a newly curated dataset. Additionally, the mean absolute error of the predicted temperatures was reduced by about 4 °C. Furthermore, Parrot manifests strong generalization capacity with superior cross-chemical-space prediction accuracy. Attention analysis indicates that Parrot effectively captures crucial chemical information and exhibits a high level of interpretability in the prediction of RCs. The proposed model Parrot exemplifies how modern neural network architecture when appropriately pretrained can be versatile in making reliable, generalizable, and interpretable recommendation for RCs even when the underlying training dataset may still be limited in diversity.

Identifiers

PMID37849643
PMCPMC10578430
OpenAlexW4386399680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.