ArticleResearch (Washington, D.C.)2023
Generic Interpretable Reaction Condition Predictions with Open Reaction Condition Datasets and Unsupervised Learning of Reaction Center.
Article in Research (Washington, D.C.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- CataCon: a contrastive graph representation learning framework for catalyst prediction.Journal of cheminformatics · 2026Article
- A general-purpose framework for chemical reaction representation with atomic correspondence and flexible condition adaptation.Journal of cheminformatics · 2026Article
- An artificial intelligence-driven synthesis planning platform (PhotoCat) for photocatalysis.Communications chemistry · 2026Article
- Conditional Variational AutoEncoder to Predict Suitable Conditions for Hydrogenation Reactions.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A virtual platform for automated hybrid organic-enzymatic synthesis planning.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Data-driven recommendation of agents, temperature, and equivalence ratios for organic synthesis.Chemical science · 2025Article
- Predicting reaction conditions: a data-driven perspective.Chemical science · 2025Review
- ASKCOS: Open-Source, Data-Driven Synthesis Planning.Accounts of chemical research · 2025Article
- Syn-MolOpt: a synthesis planning-driven molecular optimization method using data-derived functional reaction templates.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Article
- Road of Large Language Model: Source, Challenge, and Future Perspectives.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
- ProstaNet: A Novel Geometric Vector Perceptrons-Graph Neural Network Algorithm for Protein Stability Prediction in Single- and Multiple-Point Mutations with Experimental Validation.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Molecular Merged Hypergraph Neural Network for Explainable Solvation Gibbs Free Energy Prediction.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence Methods and Models for Retro-Biosynthesis: A Scoping Review.ACS synthetic biology · 2024Article
- Developing BioNavi for Hybrid Retrosynthesis Planning.JACS Au · 2024Article
- Enhancing Generic Reaction Yield Prediction through Reaction Condition-Based Contrastive Learning.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Article
- Machine learning-guided strategies for reaction conditions design and optimization.Beilstein journal of organic chemistry · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective synthesis planning powered by deep learning (DL) can significantly accelerate the discovery of new drugs and materials. However, most DL-assisted synthesis planning methods offer either none or very limited capability to recommend suitable reaction conditions (RCs) for their reaction predictions. Currently, the prediction of RCs with a DL framework is hindered by several factors, including: (a) lack of a standardized dataset for benchmarking, (b) lack of a general prediction model with powerful representation, and (c) lack of interpretability. To address these issues, we first created 2 standardized RC datasets covering a broad range of reaction classes and then proposed a powerful and interpretable Transformer-based RC predictor named Parrot. Through careful design of the model architecture, pretraining method, and training strategy, Parrot improved the overall top-3 prediction accuracy on catalysis, solvents, and other reagents by as much as 13.44%, compared to the best previous model on a newly curated dataset. Additionally, the mean absolute error of the predicted temperatures was reduced by about 4 °C. Furthermore, Parrot manifests strong generalization capacity with superior cross-chemical-space prediction accuracy. Attention analysis indicates that Parrot effectively captures crucial chemical information and exhibits a high level of interpretability in the prediction of RCs. The proposed model Parrot exemplifies how modern neural network architecture when appropriately pretrained can be versatile in making reliable, generalizable, and interpretable recommendation for RCs even when the underlying training dataset may still be limited in diversity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.