ReviewCureus2023
Investigating the Accuracy of Wheelchair Push Counts Measured by Fitness Watches: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Keeping Pace with Wearables: A Living Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews Evaluating the Accuracy of Consumer Wearable Technologies in Health Measurement.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Pooled it
- The accuracy of Apple Watch measurements: a living systematic review and meta-analysis.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Case-Based Lessons on Remote Patient Monitoring in Neurology Using Consumer-Grade Wearables.Journal of central nervous system disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wheelchair users face an elevated risk of metabolic syndromes due to their sedentary lifestyles. One of the methods to prevent and treat various metabolic syndromes is regular physical activity, which varies among individuals based on their abilities. Monitoring physical activity among them can be performed by using wearable physical activity monitors (WPAMs), which utilize accelerometers and algorithms to track wheelchair push counts. However, the accuracy of push count detection varies among the devices due to technological limitations. The objective of this literature review was to evaluate the accuracy of WPAMs, specifically smartwatches, in measuring physical activity in the wheelchair population. This systematic literature review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The databases PubMed, Embase, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) were searched in November 2022 for relevant articles. The initial search yielded 447 articles, seven of which were selected based on the inclusion criteria, which were as follows: participant ability to maneuver a wheelchair, arm- or wrist-worn WPAMs, and articles published after 2017. Among the devices studied, the Apple Watch was determined to be the most accurate calibration system for wheelchair users, with the lowest mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). Each succeeding generation of the Apple Watch (first to fourth) studied was more accurate than the previous. The review demonstrates that research on wheelchair fitness tracking remains scarce and further studies are required to address this issue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.