ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2024
Transformer-based deep learning denoising of single and multi-delay 3D arterial spin labeling.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Denoising of ASL Data Using Deep Learning Priors Generated From Distribution Remapping.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Next Generation 7 Tesla Arterial Spin Labeling With Rotated Spiral Acquisition Enables Mesoscale Resolution in 3D Brain Perfusion and Functional MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- AI-driven radiomics in vascular disease: a narrative review of image analysis and clinical translation.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Review
- Optimization of deep learning-based denoising for arterial spin labeling: Effects of averaging and training strategies.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Transformer-based arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI denoising.The Visual computer · 2025Article
- Article
- High resolution multi-delay arterial spin labeling with self-supervised deep learning denoising for pediatric choroid plexus perfusion MRI.NeuroImage · 2025Article
- Improved accuracy for myocardial blood flow mapping with deep learning-enabled CMR arterial spin labeling (DeepMASL): Validation by microsphere in vivo.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2025Article
- Article
- Deep Learning Denoising Improves CT Perfusion Image Quality in the Setting of Lower Contrast Dosing: A Feasibility Study.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024Article
- High Resolution Multi-delay Arterial Spin Labeling with Transformer based Denoising for Pediatric Perfusion MRI.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Whole-Cerebrum distortion-free three-dimensional pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling at 7T.NeuroImage · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo present a Swin Transformer-based deep learning (DL) model (SwinIR) for denoising single-delay and multi-delay 3D arterial spin labeling (ASL) and compare its performance with convolutional neural network (CNN) and other Transformer-based methods.
methodsSwinIR and CNN-based spatial denoising models were developed for single-delay ASL. The models were trained on 66 subjects (119 scans) and tested on 39 subjects (44 scans) from three different vendors. Spatiotemporal denoising models were developed using another dataset (6 subjects, 10 scans) of multi-delay ASL. A range of input conditions was tested for denoising single and multi-delay ASL, respectively. The performance was evaluated using similarity metrics, spatial SNR and quantification accuracy of cerebral blood flow (CBF), and arterial transit time (ATT).
resultsSwinIR outperformed CNN and other Transformer-based networks, whereas pseudo-3D models performed better than 2D models for denoising single-delay ASL. The similarity metrics and image quality (SNR) improved with more slices in pseudo-3D models and further improved when using M0 as input, but introduced greater biases for CBF quantification. Pseudo-3D models with three slices achieved optimal balance between SNR and accuracy, which can be generalized to different vendors. For multi-delay ASL, spatiotemporal denoising models had better performance than spatial-only models with reduced biases in fitted CBF and ATT maps.
conclusionsSwinIR provided better performance than CNN and other Transformer-based methods for denoising both single and multi-delay 3D ASL data. The proposed model offers flexibility to improve image quality and/or reduce scan time for 3D ASL to facilitate its clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.