ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2023
Parental Intervention Program for Preschool children with Rare Diseases - a mixed methods evaluation of parents' experiences and utility.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of rare diseases on the quality of life in paediatric patients: current status.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study was twofold: (i) To assess the parents' experiences and perception of participating in a "Parental Intervention Program for Preschool children with Rare Diseases" (PIPP-RDs). (ii) To evaluate which elements of the PIPP-RDs that the parents emphasized as important for improving their health literacy related to facilitating the transition of their children from kindergarten to school.
methodA mixed methods evaluation study was conducted ten and eleven months post-intervention, integrating an online quantitative survey combined with individual semi-structured interviews. Twenty-two parents participated in individual interviews, of these 18 also responded to the online questionnaire survey.
resultsAll parents that participated in this study reported that the information conveyed at the program was of great value and utility, 88% reported significantly alleviated stress associated to their child`s school-start, 84% indicated had improved the school-home collaboration and 84% reported that it had encouraged them to establish contact with the school prior to school commencement. From the qualitative data five main themes emerged: (i) Competence and Knowledge Acquisition, (ii) Becoming more Prepared and Relaxed, (iii) Achieved Realistic Expectations, (iv) Enhanced Communication Skills, (v) Increased Health Literacy and Self-Efficacy. The evaluative findings suggest that this invention program has notably improved the parents' aptitude for school interaction, enhanced the adaptions according to children`s needs for accommodations, and has provided reassurance in the school-home collaboration. Parents also described increased self-confidence and self-efficacy in managing the school start for children with RDs.
conclusionThe highly positive response of participating in PIPP-RDs may not only reflect the merits of the program`s content, but also underscore the significant needs for such support during the transition to school for parents of children with RDs. Comparable initiatives, oriented towards enhancing the health literacy and empowering the parents, are anticipated to yield similarly favourable results. We argue that intervention program amalgamate pertinent information, group discourse, and workshops on school-related issues, alongside opportunities for parents to meet other parents in similar situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.