Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37848936›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2023

Midwife-led birthing centres in four countries: a case study.

Oliva Bazirete, Kirsty Hughes, Sofia Castro Lopes, Sabera Turkmani, Abu Sayeed Abdullah, Tasleem Ayaz, Sheila E Clow, Joshua Epuitai, Abdul Halim, Zainab Khawaja and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Oliva BazireteCollege of Medicine and Health, Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda. baziretoliva@gmail.com.
Kirsty HughesNovametrics Ltd, Duffield, UK.
Sofia Castro LopesIndependent Consultant, Cape Town, South Africa.
Sabera TurkmaniBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Abu Sayeed AbdullahCentre for Injury Prevention and Research, Bangladesh (CIPRB), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Tasleem AyazIndependent Consultant, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Sheila E ClowUniversity of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa.
Joshua EpuitaiBusitema University, Tororo, Uganda.
Abdul HalimCentre for Injury Prevention and Research, Bangladesh (CIPRB), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Zainab KhawajaResearch & Development Solutions, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Scovia Nalugo MbalindaMakerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Karin MinnieUniversity of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.
Rose Chalo NabiryeBusitema University, Tororo, Uganda.
Razia NaveedResearch & Development Solutions, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Faith NawagiMakerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Fazlur RahmanCentre for Injury Prevention and Research, Bangladesh (CIPRB), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Saad Ibrahim RasheedResearch & Development Solutions, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Hania RehmanResearch & Development Solutions, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Andrea NoveNovametrics Ltd, Duffield, UK.
Mandy ForresterInternational Confederation of Midwives, The Hague, Netherlands.
Shree MandkeInternational Confederation of Midwives, The Hague, Netherlands.
Sally PairmanInternational Confederation of Midwives, The Hague, Netherlands.
Caroline S E HomerBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation INV - 033046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMidwives are essential providers of primary health care and can play a major role in the provision of health care that can save lives and improve sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn and adolescent health outcomes. One way for midwives to deliver care is through midwife-led birth centres (MLBCs). Most of the evidence on MLBCs is from high-income countries but the opportunity for impact of MLBCs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) could be significant as this is where most maternal and newborn deaths occur. The aim of this study is to explore MLBCs in four low-to-middle income countries, specifically to understand what is needed for a successful MLBC.

methodsA descriptive case study design was employed in 4 sites in each of four countries: Bangladesh, Pakistan, South Africa and Uganda. We used an Appreciative Inquiry approach, informed by a network of care framework. Key informant interviews were conducted with 77 MLBC clients and 33 health service leaders and senior policymakers. Fifteen focus group discussions were used to collect data from 100 midwives and other MLBC staff.

resultsKey enablers to a successful MLBC were: (i) having an effective financing model (ii) providing quality midwifery care that is recognised by the community (iii) having interdisciplinary and interfacility collaboration, coordination and functional referral systems, and (iv) ensuring supportive and enabling leadership and governance at all levels.

conclusionThe findings of this study have significant implications for improving maternal and neonatal health outcomes, strengthening healthcare systems, and promoting the role of midwives in LMICs. Understanding factors for success can contribute to inform policies and decision making as well as design tailored maternal and newborn health programmes that can more effectively support midwives and respond to population needs. At an international level, it can contribute to shape guidelines and strengthen the midwifery profession in different settings.

Indexed as

Birthing CentersMidwiferyAdolescentDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLeadershipPregnancyReferral and ConsultationBangladeshChildbirthLow and middle income countriesMidwife led birthing centreMidwiferyPakistanSouth AfricaUganda

Identifiers

PMID37848936
PMCPMC10583445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.