Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37848859›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2023

The value of radiomics-based CT combined with machine learning in the diagnosis of occult vertebral fractures.

Wu-Gen Li, Rou Zeng, Yong Lu, Wei-Xiang Li, Tong-Tong Wang, Huashan Lin, Yun Peng, Liang-Geng Gong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Local fragility index and Radiomics-lite modeling of CT-Derived Hounsfield units for osteoporosis risk assessment in spine surgery patients.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Radiomics in spinal research: a narrative review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wu-Gen LiDepartment of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, No. 1Minde Road, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, China.
Rou ZengDepartment of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, No. 1Minde Road, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, China.
Yong LuDepartment of Radiology, Xinjian County People's Hospital, Nanchang, 330103, China.
Wei-Xiang LiDepartment of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, No. 1Minde Road, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, China.
Tong-Tong WangDepartment of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, No. 1Minde Road, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, China.
Huashan LinDepartment of Pharmaceuticals Diagnosis, GE Healthcare, Changsha, Hunan, 410000, China.
Yun PengDepartment of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, No. 1Minde Road, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, China.
Liang-Geng GongDepartment of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, No. 1Minde Road, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, China. gong111999@126.com.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University · CNNanchang University · CNHejian People's Hospital · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81660284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop and evaluate the performance of radiomics-based computed tomography (CT) combined with machine learning algorithms in detecting occult vertebral fractures (OVFs). MATERIALS AND

methods128 vertebrae including 64 with OVF confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging and 64 corresponding control vertebrae from 57 patients who underwent chest/abdominal CT scans, were included. The CT radiomics features on mid-axial and mid-sagittal plane of each vertebra were extracted. The fractured and normal vertebrae were randomly divided into training set and validation set at a ratio of 8:2. Pearson correlation analyses and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator were used for selecting sagittal and axial features, respectively. Three machine-learning algorithms were used to construct the radiomics models based on the residual features. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to verify the performance of model.

resultsFor mid-axial CT imaging, 6 radiomics parameters were obtained and used for building the models. The logistic regression (LR) algorithm showed the best performance with area under the ROC curves (AUC) of training and validation sets of 0.682 and 0.775. For mid-sagittal CT imaging, 5 parameters were selected, and LR algorithms showed the best performance with AUC of training and validation sets of 0.832 and 0.882. The LR model based on sagittal CT yielded the best performance, with an accuracy of 0.846, sensitivity of 0.846, and specificity of 0.846.

conclusionMachine learning based on CT radiomics features allows for the detection of OVFs, especially the LR model based on the radiomics of sagittal imaging, which indicates it is promising to further combine with deep learning to achieve automatic recognition of OVFs to reduce the associated secondary injury.

Indexed as

Fractures, ClosedSpinal FracturesHumansMachine LearningRetrospective StudiesSpineTomography, X-Ray ComputedCTMachine learningOccult vertebral fracturesRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID37848859
PMCPMC10580519
OpenAlexW4387694306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.