Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37848767›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2024

Continuous suprascapular nerve blockade to potentiate intensive rehabilitation for refractory adhesive shoulder capsulitis: a cohort study.

Géraldine Martens, Robert Fontaine, Pierre Goffin, Mélissa Raaf, Hadrien Tasset, Jean-Pierre Lecoq, Karim Benmouna, Jean-François Kaux, Bénédicte Forthomme

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Adhesive capsulitis: current concepts.Musculoskeletal surgery · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Géraldine MartensDepartment of Physical Medicine and Sports Traumatology, SportS², FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, IOC Research Centre for Prevention of Injury and Protection of Athlete Health, FIMS Collaborative Center of Sports Medicine, University and University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium. geraldine.martens@uliege.be.ORCID 0000-0001-7038-7165
Robert FontaineAnesthesia & Intensive Care Department, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Pierre GoffinAnesthesia & Intensive Care Department, MontLegia Hospital, Groupe Santé CHC, Liège, Belgium.
Mélissa RaafAnesthesia & Intensive Care Department, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Hadrien TassetAnesthesia & Intensive Care Department, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Jean-Pierre LecoqAnesthesia & Intensive Care Department, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Karim BenmounaDepartment of Physical Medicine and Sports Traumatology, SportS², FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, IOC Research Centre for Prevention of Injury and Protection of Athlete Health, FIMS Collaborative Center of Sports Medicine, University and University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Jean-François KauxDepartment of Physical Medicine and Sports Traumatology, SportS², FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, IOC Research Centre for Prevention of Injury and Protection of Athlete Health, FIMS Collaborative Center of Sports Medicine, University and University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Bénédicte ForthommeDepartment of Physical Medicine and Sports Traumatology, SportS², FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, IOC Research Centre for Prevention of Injury and Protection of Athlete Health, FIMS Collaborative Center of Sports Medicine, University and University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
University of Liège · BECentre Hospitalier Chrétien · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEvaluating the short- and long-term efficacy of a continuous ten day suprascapular nerve block combined with daily multidisciplinary rehabilitation on shoulder range of motion (ROM), pain, and function in patients with refractory adhesive capsulitis (AC).

methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, patients admitted to a specialized pain clinic for refractory AC for more than 6 months underwent continuous suprascapular nerve blockade for ten days and received 2 hours of physiotherapy and occupational therapy daily. Standardized assessments were performed at baseline, at days three, six, ten, 30, 90, and 180, and included active and passive ROM measurements, the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire to assess pain, disability, and quality of life. Improvements over time were assessed using ANOVAs.

resultsThirty-two patients were followed (age: 52 ± 8 years, 25 females, mean symptoms duration of two years). There was a significant improvement in ROM for all amplitudes at day ten (short-term; range: 20-35°, p < 0.001) and at day 180 (long-term; range: 18-47°, p < 0.001). The pain and disability scores significantly reduced by day 180 (mean VAS reduction: 2.6 units, p < 0.001; mean DASH reduction: 9.5 points, p < 0.001).

conclusionContinuous SSNB combined with intensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation represents an efficient therapeutic option for patients with chronic AC who did not respond to conventional treatments.

Indexed as

BursitisNerve BlockAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRange of Motion, ArticularRetrospective StudiesShoulderShoulder PainTreatment OutcomeAdhesive capsulitisAnesthesiaFrozen shoulderRange of motionRehabilitationSuprascapular nerve block

Identifiers

PMID37848767
OpenAlexW4387707724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.