ArticleThe protein journal2024
Use of 2D FFT and DTW in Protein Sequence Comparison.
Article in The protein journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Overcoming translational barriers in RNA-protein docking: enhancing computational accuracy for targeted drug discovery.Future medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein sequence comparison remains a challenging work for the researchers owing to the computational complexity due to the presence of 20 amino acids compared with only four nucleotides in Genome sequences. Further, protein sequences of different species are of different lengths; it throws additional changes to the researchers to develop methods, specially alignment-free methods, to compare protein sequences. In this work, an efficient technique to compare protein sequences is developed by a graphical representation. First, the classified grouping of 20 amino acids with a cardinality of 4 based on polar class is considered to narrow down the representational range from 20 to 4. Then a unit vector technique based on a two-quadrant Cartesian system is proposed to provide a new two-dimensional graphical representation of the protein sequence. Now, two approaches are proposed to cope with the varying lengths of protein sequences from various species: one uses Dynamic Time Warping (DTW), while the other one uses a two-dimensional Fast Fourier Transform (2D FFT). Next, the effectiveness of these two techniques is analyzed using two evaluation criteria-quantitative measures based on symmetric distance (SD) and computational speed. An analysis is performed on five data sets of 9 ND4, 9 ND5, 9 ND6, 12 Baculovirus, and 24 TF proteins under the two methods. It is found that the FFT-based method produces the same results as DTW but in less computational time. It is found that the result of the proposed method agrees with the known biological reference. Further, the present method produces better clustering than the existing ones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.